Timestamp test

Brad wrote:
> I'm sending this email as a test. About half a dozen people responded to my
> query about the time problem that relates to the email time sent/received.
> I've made some of their recommended changes.
>
> This was sent at 8:30 pm, please let me know what appears on your end.
> Hopefully it's fixed.
>
> Thanks Jules,
>
> Brad

Mine shows 9:30 EST. Your message source (header information) reads:

Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:30:02 -0500

My post would read:

Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:30:02 -0400

... IF I posted at the same time. I'm in Ky, but should have the same
-0400 difference from GMT as you.

Hope this helps, but I don't know why you're showing -0500.

--
Joe =o)

> "Elmo" <elmogeek DeleteThis @xxx.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ewu1z5dWKHA.4148@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Brad wrote:
>> I'm sending this email as a test. About half a dozen people responded to
>> my
>> query about the time problem that relates to the email time
>> sent/received.
>> I've made some of their recommended changes.
>>
>> This was sent at 8:30 pm, please let me know what appears on your end.
>> Hopefully it's fixed.
>>
>> Thanks Jules,
>>
>> Brad
>
> Mine shows 9:30 EST. Your message source (header information) reads:
>
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:30:02 -0500
>
> My post would read:
>
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:30:02 -0400
>
> .. IF I posted at the same time. I'm in Ky, but should have the same
> -0400 difference from GMT as you.
>
> Hope this helps, but I don't know why you're showing -0500.
>
> --
> Joe =o)

Hi Joe,

The OP (Original Poster) is in Toronto, Canada, on EST, not EDT like you
were when you posted, (and now you should be on EST, with -0500.

See his other messages subject:
Time Stamp problem on Incoming and Outgoing emails
news:a5EGm.216$v47.1@newsfe23.iad

I think we are all on the same page now, until we "Spring Forward" again.

(Triple-click here, to speed up the year.
--Richard