In article
<14345c74-9807-4562-8f93-e5e71ed6a7f5 RemoveThis @l13g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
Markus Dehmann <markus.dehmann RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want an *iphone* because it would bind me to a phone company,
> and I really dislike that. I hate being bound in 1- or 2-year
> contracts that, I think, will just be extended if I don't cancel, and
> paying high monthly fees (currently $55 incl. tax and fees for my
> Verizon phone).
Fair enough, but in the interest of completeness I'll just mention that
the Apple store is reportedly now selling 3g iPhones without contract.
They're more expensive because of that, but on the other hand you don't
get locked in to a long-term deal.
> How viable is the ipod touch + Skype alternative? Can you always run
> the Skype app in the background, or would it always have to be open
> and block my main ipod window? Can I receive a call while I listen to
> music? Surf the web?
As it stands right now, the iPod would prevent Skype from running in the
background, so you could not receive calls unless Skype was the
foreground app. (This assumes you can receive calls when it's in the
foreground, which I expect is true but have not verified). This is a
limitation imposed by the iPod and not something Skype can change.
Based on Apple's announced features for iPhone OS 3.0, it should be
possible for Skype to add this as a 3.0-only feature once that OS is
released. Whether Skype chooses to do so is something only they can
answer, but I know of no technical hurdle that would apply. iPhone OS
3.0 would be available for the iPod touch and would probably be a $10-20
upgrade.
--
Tom "Tom" Harrington
Independent Mac OS X developer since 2002
http://www.atomicbird.com/