Welcome to Soft32 Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.

 
   Soft32 Home -> Mac -> Comm RSS
Next:  always get two windows  
Author Message
Ivan Gorelik

External


Since: Mar 27, 2009
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:41 am
Post subject: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.
Archived from groups: comp>sys>mac>hardware>misc, others (more info?)

Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.

On the gif-animated picture you can see the example of the densest
packing in the 4d space
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/4rotat.html
If our Universe is closed, then it can rotate.
The last observations give several proves of this idea.
Non-Euclidean closed Universe can be imagined as three-sphere
x^2+y^2+z^2+q^2=r^2, arranged into Euclidean 4-d space, where q is
aditional coordinate, associated with color. That is slightly remind
us the left figure, without the central ball. That will be the
rotation in 4-d space. We live in pseudo-Euclidean space-time. That is
why, we must change the q-coordinate into ict-coordinate.
In order to see the rotation in the pseudo-Euclidean plane (x,ict) you
can open my program http://darkenergy.narod.ru/SR2007.exe
It is very interesting that the length of two hyperboles after
dividing of every element of hyperboles by corresponding g is iqual to
2pri. And more, - the quantable velocity was found. As a result the
time-axis can by finite and closed.
Now unite the two pictures and imagine the rotation of pseudo-
Euclidean hyper-sphere: x^2+y^2+z^2+(ict)^2=r^2.
All points of the Universe can move with the same linear velocity c,
and with the same angular velocity H.
The usual ball can not rotate such, that all it's point moved with the
same linear velocity. In this sense the Universe is more homogeneous.
But we can find one dipole (axis-plane of rotation B) for every point
A of such Universe. Moreover any point A has its proper axis-plane B
and the point A is situated at B. The point A divides B on to rays.
Let say, that this axis-plane is composed by axes z and ict. In every
point of the Universe the square of 4-velocity (vg, icg), is equal to -
c2. At the point A v=0. Consequently its g=1 and 4-velocyty of this
point has only time component (0, ic). Point A moves here with the
velocity of light only relatively the time-coordinate. All other
points of this axis-plane has a spatial component of 4-velocity.
Consequently all galaxies visible from A along the axis-plane (z,ict)
will be transverse red-shifted along z-coordinate. But all galaxies
laying on this axis-plane does not move relatively each other, - they
rotate together along circumference in the plane (z,ict). The plane-
axis (x,y), perpendicular to axis (z,ict) is circular and embraces the
axis-plane at the distance R. It is also rotating. And the galaxies,
visible in that direction will also be transverse red-shifted.
Such rotation explains many-many things, I can not write all here. And
only make a note.
Rotation gives and explains:
the spin of every particle of Universe;
particle's quantum ø-function;
the right-left asymmetry in galaxies spirality;
why the conventional age of the Universe is constant and is 13,34
billion years, always!
abnormal rotational velocities of peripheral stars in galaxies;
the critical density in such Universe is less...
If the velocity along the axes are slightly different we will see the
multipole structure in the cosmic microwave background radiation; the
difference in red-shifts of galaxies.


Somebody wrote:
: Excellent 4-D information!

: I've been re-working my "hypersphere" (4-D) theory of the Red
Shift,
: but things not going so well. Problem is that Hubble distance data
: actually fits distance to stars even without "expanding" 4-D
universe
: (so-called "no center") but my theory does not seem to fit so well.
: I'm not even sure why Hubble distance is a log fuction of red
shift.


Thank you.
My H is the angular velocity of light in the hypersphere-universe. It
is H=73,3 km/s/Mpc or 2.37565(35)E-18 rot/s or 2.37565(35)E-18 rot/s.
This value gives us the CONVENTIONAL age of Universe: 13.3387(23)
bln.years/rot.
Compare this value with CONVENTIONAL age of Earth: 365 days/rot.
The ACTUAL age of Universe is infinity.

If there is rotation then there is f=ma=mc^2/R.
Every proton has quantum of action h - universal microrotation; and
quantum of force f, (h*nu0 = f*lambda0) leading to universal
macrorotation.
Under the influence of this quantum of force every proton rotates in
the Universe, making the one full rotation per one Universal year,
which is equal to 13.34 bln.years.

The value nu0 is the boundary frequency. nu0 = NH= 734.147!/s,
(lambda0= 408 km/!, t0=0.00136s/!)
This is the center of acoustic fluctuations.
This is the boundary between graviton and photon in 4-d quantum
lattice of Universe with the main quantum number N=3.09030(23)E+20.
The sign ! is a "flash", the lattice parameter of macroscopic
synchronization.

Our Universe is eternal and must have the eternal sources of energy.
The solution of Bell paradox gives the stellar sources of energy.
Macroscopic synchronization of matter in the gravity field leads to
energy output.
This source gives 2/3 of the solar energy output.

My formula of the stellar energy output (P~M^4/R^5) coincides with
observations and reminds the Hawking formula for BH evaporation (P~M^4/
R^6). Hawking formula leads to crisis under subplankian values. The
cause is clear.
Hawking did not used the main quantum number.

If we substitute the N in his formula we will go out from the crisis
under subplankian values, and we will receive the formula of stellar
energy sources in the ETERNAL Universe.

The second conclusion: if the corrected Hawking formula denies the
black holes, what star's explosions do we observe in the sky?

The answer is clear, - that is MAGNETIC holes.

Nucleon has the rest energy mc^2.
It also has the magnetic energy, which is about 0.001 of it's rest
energy.

If the nucleon will enter in the 1000 times stronger magnetic field
it's magnetic energy will overpass its rest energy and the nucleon can
decay.

Some theorists dream about the "monopole catalyses of proton's decay"
at the collider.
I say that we will have no "monopole catalyses of proton's decay" but
bose-condensation of proton and neutron into magnetic trap of Devil.
The condensation is accompanied by emission of positrons and
antineutrino from decaying protons and neutrons. Resulting bosons will
widen the surface of magnetic trap.
Magnetic trap has the constant critical field ~ 10^16Tl.
The Earth can be transformed into magnetic trap with the radius about
10 meters.

Microscopic magnetic traps can be made on collider.

CERN scientists do not pay attention on my letters because they are
slaves of BB religion and want to test their religious theory at the
collider.
BB - is a marasmatic theory.
BigBangers will make "Big Bang" from our Earth. But the Universe is
eternal.

----------
Scientists, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime.
The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials.
The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the
accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us.
People! Do not hope silently, that we will be saved again the next
time. Make something!

News, links, the appeal about donations in order to make the Living
Wall in front of LHC.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html
What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezen.html
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html
Magnetic trap of Devil..
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
Arguments,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html
Back to top
Login to vote
No one

External


Since: May 28, 2006
Posts: 6



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:44 am
Post subject: Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived
Back to top
Login to vote
Gene E. Bloch

External


Since: Mar 27, 2009
Posts: 4



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:49 am
Post subject: Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:41:21 -0700 (PDT), Ivan Gorelik wrote:

> The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the
> accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us.

Better luck next time Smile

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
Back to top
Login to vote
Ivan Gorelik

External


Since: Mar 27, 2009
Posts: 2



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:54 am
Post subject: Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> > CERN scientists do not pay attention on my letters because they are
> > slaves of BB religion and want to test their religious theory at the
> > collider.
>
> They don't pay attention because you are a fruitcake.


They don't pay attention because they are religious killers.

Here is the discussion from sci.physics:

> >>>> Same question with expansion;
> >>>> expand with respect to what?

Yes. Excellent comparison.
SR says: 4-velocity gives "c" for every point in Universe.
Any point can be central.
Let any point O is a center of expansion / rotation.
Then it has v_spatial=0, v_time = c.

All other points will have:

in expanding model v_spatial=/=0, v_time =/= 0.
v_spatial is radial, showing the expansion.
H - parameter of expansion

in rotating model v_spatial=/=0, v_time =/= 0.
v_spatial is tangent, shawing the rotation.
H - angular velocity: H=73,3 km/s/Mpc=2.37565(35)E-18 rot/s=2.37565(35)
E-18 rot/s.

The horizon of events:
in both model v_spatial=c, v_time 0.
but in expanding model v_spatial is radial; in rotating model
v_spatial is tangential;
but in expanding model universe is finite in time and it was born
about 13 bln years ago;
in rotating model universe is eternal, the time 13,34 billion years is
it's universal year, the time of one full rotation.
....
> >> Well, rotation would be observable from within as well, through (for
> >> example) Coriolis forces.
....
No. This rotation is not so simple.
Rotation of real space-time lattice relatively non-real mathematical
4d-space.
Light moves with c relatively physical space-time.
Metric of rotating space-time is quite hard.


> >> I don't see any fundamental difference between expansion and rotation

one if finite in time, another is eternally rotating.


> > Observations indicate that if the universe has rotated over the last
> > 13.7 Gyr, that the rotation angel is << 1°

Observation gives the angular velocity of universe
H ~ 13 -14 km/s/Mpc.
Computations in rotating model give more exact value:
H=73,3 km/s/Mpc=2.37565(35)E-18 rot/s=2.37565(35)E-18 rot/s.
This value gives us the CONVENTIONAL age of Universe: 13.3387(23)
bln.years/rot.
Compare this value with your 13.7 Gyr.

....
> > Imagine just as the Universe's Energy was created as non-zero at the Big
> > Bang, so to was its angular momentum.

Big Bang is religion.
BigBaners try to test their marazmic BB model at collider. That will
make Big Bang of Earth.
BigBangers are not simply the adherents of BB Theory, they are
creators of Earth's Big Bang.

....
> > I could quite happily accept some solutions to GR that assumed the
> > Universe was rotating; that does not seem that different to me than
> > solutions of GR for rotating black holes, and indeed the Universe itself
> > could be a black hole for all we know now (ie closed).

....

There are no black holes. Hawking had lost N in his evaporation's
formula. It describes the star's luminosity.
There are magnetic holes in Universe. MMHs can be created at collider.

....
> > One thing I would expect to see is the Universe expanding at faster rate
> > than currently predicted. Did I hear anybody say "Dark Energy"? Wink

Dark Energy is my nick; in my model the transverse pressure of light
equal to transverse pressure of gravity force with opposite sign. As a
result the Universe no shrinks, no expands. As a result we have
theoretical value of the temperature of light, needed to sustain the
transverse gravity forces. That is why we have T_CBR=2.728K.
The "dark energy" in BB model is nonsense, needed no describe the
accelerated expansion.. HA-HA-HA... Idiots...
>
> One big problem with whole universe rotation are the ideas of center,
> axis, etc. which fly in the face of observation.

No center. Every point is central.
For any point there are two proper axis-planes of rotation.


------------
Additional reading:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-----
Extremely urgent note, 2009.

Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!

Scientists, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a
crime.
The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials.
The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the
accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us.


People! Do not hope silently, that we will be saved again the next
time. Make something!

News, links, the appeal about donations in order to make the Living
Wall in front of LHC.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/biz.html

What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of
Devil?
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html

Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/civilen.html

Magnetic trap of Devil.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html

Arguments
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html

Magnetic trap. Figures.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/mhpicen.html
Back to top
Login to vote
Jamie Kahn Genet

External


Since: Nov 08, 2004
Posts: 957



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Ivan Gorelik <darkenergy.RemoveThis@yandex.ru> wrote:

> Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.
[snip insane ranting]

Hi.

You don't realise it, but you're mentally ill. You think you're sane
because you're too mentally ill to know there's something seriously
wrong with you. But really you are a fruitcake. Even if you don't
believe me, perhaps you make an appointment with your doctor and discuss
this.

Yours sincerely,
guy who just PLONKED you Smile
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Local connection and internet connection - I have a cable modem connected to a D-Link 704 routing to a PC and two Macs. The two Macs are: and older Power..

No doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. - La Site Communique; 10/02/2004 20:38:35 >>> Commence >>> >>> Hello, bienvenue, bienvenid...

Cube like Window Rotation - Hi, If user fast switching is enabled in Panther, loginwindow does a rather spectacular rotation of the desktop window...

iPhoto 4 and image rotation - The two features I miss most in iPhoto are - automatic rotation of pictures when they are imported from a camera with...

Problem: rotation of graphics on the printout - I have a Word document with inserted graphics created from Canvas 8 program. The Word is the most up to date (with the....

Image rotation on RasterOps 2075RO/Sony - I have one of these (A.K.A. Sony SCC-F59G-A), and it looks pretty good, but the image is tilted. I t does not have a....
       Soft32 Home -> Mac -> Comm All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
 Linux
  Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]