[News] [Rival] Windows Vista Still Loathed (Digest)

John Locke <johnlocke98513.RemoveThis@comcast.net> espoused:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:14:01 GMT, anon.RemoveThis@anon.com wrote:
>
>>Well, our name is Ron Matthews, if that is your complaint. Simply
>>do a google search on cordially, as always, and you'll have our
>>name.
> I have and you're about as popular as the black plague.
>>
>>cordially, as always,
> ..as cordial as a pit full of vipers.
>>
>>rm
>
>

Killfile was the right choice for this one.

--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |

It was on, or about, Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:41:10 +0100, that as I was
halfway through a large jam doughnut, Mark Kent wrote:

> John Locke <johnlocke98513 RemoveThis @comcast.net> espoused:
>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:14:01 GMT, anon RemoveThis @anon.com wrote:
>>
>>>Well, our name is Ron Matthews, if that is your complaint. Simply do a
>>>google search on cordially, as always, and you'll have our name.
>> I have and you're about as popular as the black plague.
>>>
>>>cordially, as always,
>> ..as cordial as a pit full of vipers.
>>>
>>>rm

> Killfile was the right choice for this one.

Agreed, I only read two of it's posts.

--
The universe exploded out of nothingness 14 billion years ago.
14 billion years later, & some of us have 100 trillion
interconnected cells, & a self-aware consciousness.
Others post through GoogleGroups, & insist on installing Vista.

After takin' a swig o' grog, anon DeleteThis @anon.com belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> Linonut <linonut DeleteThis @bellsouth.net> says:
>
>>"Our"?
>
> Yep. What's your name? Or is that a big secret?

Can't read the headers?

>>You seem to be yet another poster who adopts a stuffy, polite
>>manner, while emitting insinuations and patronization, not to
>>mention some real hokum.
>
> And all you have done in this posting is "challenge" our statements
> with silly ad hominem attacks.
>
> If you wish to be treated with respect, by respectable posters, you
> have to act in a respectable and responsible manner. Calling
> somebody a "windows-bot" merely because they point out some way that
> windoze is better than linux, shows you to be a linux zealot. As
> such, you are the worst enemy linux has, and you are a waste of time
> to converse with because you are uttely incapable of reasonable
> discourse.

Buddy, you are not a respectable poster. You are simply a troll.

> IOW, bugger off.
>
> cordially, as always,

Bullshit.

--
Tux rox!

After takin' a swig o' grog, anon.TakeThisOut@anon.com belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> Your problem is probably found deep within some nebulous and
> neurotic personal psychological profile, for which real help is not
> something that you could ever hope to afford. We suggest that you
> think a little more carefully about what you say in the future.
> Don't do things in the heat of the moment because unless you act
> with a cool head you are likely to expose your weaknesses to others,
> just as you have to us.

<grin>

> cordially, as always,

Bullshit.

--
Tux rox!

After takin' a swig o' grog, anon RemoveThis @anon.com belched out this bit o' wisdom:

<supercilious pretense snipped>

> cordially, as always,

Bullshit.

--
Tux rox!

After takin' a swig o' grog, Mark Kent belched out this bit o' wisdom:

>> I dunno, this "rm" (anon@anon.com) guy might be trying to make a name
>> for himself, a la' tholen. Shan't we help him along?
>
> Apparently, he already has a very poor name indeed...

Indubitably.

cordially, as always

Linonut

--
Bullshit!

anon.TakeThisOut@anon.com writes:

>
> If you wish to be treated with respect, by respectable posters, you
> have to act in a respectable and responsible manner. Calling
> somebody a "windows-bot" merely because they point out some way that
> windoze is better than linux, shows you to be a linux zealot. As
> such, you are the worst enemy linux has, and you are a waste of time
> to converse with because you are uttely incapable of reasonable
> discourse.

Aha. You have met Linonut. He used to be quite reasonable but is pretty
much a laughing stock these days.

Mark Kent wrote:

>John Locke <johnlocke98513.RemoveThis@comcast.net> espoused:
>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:14:01 GMT, anon.RemoveThis@anon.com wrote:
>>
>>>Well, our name is Ron Matthews, if that is your complaint. Simply
>>>do a google search on cordially, as always, and you'll have our
>>>name.
>>
>> I have and you're about as popular as the black plague.
>>>
>>>cordially, as always,
>>
>> ..as cordial as a pit full of vipers.
>
>Killfile was the right choice for this one.

Exactly. I'll have to keep it mind, that when I see "cordially", to
follow-up with "*plonk*".

Mark Kent <mark.kent RemoveThis @demon.co.uk> says:

>No doubt he'll be "cordially" back again under another nym soon.

You're just so self-centered, aren't you? If and when we change our
user name, it'll have absolutely nothing to do with you, your trollish
pals, and your alleged killfiles.

Get over yourself. You're just not important enough for us to care
about. Laugh at, sure. But care about? Nope.

cordially, as always,

rm

rosie DeleteThis @matsushita.org <rosie DeleteThis @matsushita.org> espoused:
> Mark Kent <mark.kent DeleteThis @demon.co.uk> says:
>
>>No doubt he'll be "cordially" back again under another nym soon.
>

<snip>

I'm assuming this doesn't change, so this goes into the leafnode
filter (or something close, but with a regex, probably).

Sender: <rm DeleteThis @realto.justlinux.ca>

Let's see if he's "cordially" back again... I can always kfile on
the path, but maybe it won't be necessary.

--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| My (new) blog: http://www.thereisnomagic.org |

____/ rosie RemoveThis @matsushita.org on Wednesday 01 August 2007 10:35 : \____

> Mark Kent <mark.kent RemoveThis @demon.co.uk> says:
>
>>No doubt he'll be "cordially" back again under another nym soon.
>
> You're just so self-centered, aren't you? If and when we change our
> user name, it'll have absolutely nothing to do with you, your trollish
> pals, and your alleged killfiles.
>
> Get over yourself. You're just not important enough for us to care
> about. Laugh at, sure. But care about? Nope.
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm

*plonk*

Nymshift much?

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "All your archives are (sic) belong to Google"
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 27.1%us, 4.5%sy, 1.0%ni, 62.7%id, 4.2%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information

It was on, or about, Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:19:02 +0100, that as I was
halfway through a large jam doughnut, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ____/ rosie RemoveThis @matsushita.org on Wednesday 01 August 2007 10:35 : \____
>
>> Mark Kent <mark.kent RemoveThis @demon.co.uk> says:
>>
>>>No doubt he'll be "cordially" back again under another nym soon.
>>
>> You're just so self-centered, aren't you? If and when we change our
>> user name, it'll have absolutely nothing to do with you, your trollish
>> pals, and your alleged killfiles.
>>
>> Get over yourself. You're just not important enough for us to care
>> about. Laugh at, sure. But care about? Nope.
>>
>> cordially, as always,
>>
>> rm
>
> *plonk*
>
> Nymshift much?

I dunno, I don't see any of them....only replies to the troll. As for
"alleged killfiles", the jerk has no idea which headers can be used to kf
it. The "References" header can also be used, so you won't even see
replies.

--
The universe exploded out of nothingness 14 billion years ago.
14 billion years later, & some of us have 100 trillion
interconnected cells, & a self-aware consciousness.
Others post through GoogleGroups, & insist on installing Vista.