Recently, we had a discussion about the quality of ATI drivers vs NVIDIA. I
said some salesmen told me NVIDIA were better, but was answered that we
should encourage ATI because they at least provide some code.
Well, according to ARCH Linux developers, it seems that when it comes to
proprietary drivers ATI just doesn't compare to NVIDIA:
"Andreas Radke and I have talked about this and have come to a
conclusion. The ATI catalyst drivers are in a pitiful state and AMD is
doing close to nothing to improve the situation, they just take Linux as
a joke. At least, that is the impression one gets when nvidia releases
great drivers for Linux and ATI in the other hand is not showing any
promises in making their drivers better and well supported.
"In the other hand the radeonhd driver, which is in extra shows some
promise, and so far have been good, they have been able to make a good
driver with only some documentation released by AMD, when AMD can't make
one while being the makers, go figure out.
"This situation is worse in the x86_64 system, we have been stuck with
catalyst 8.12 while i686 has 9.2 already, because AMD just wanted to
break things at will, because their approach is very strange, break some
things to improve others.
<http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-February/010394.html>
It seems to me that whatever code ATi-AMD provides is what could be found
fairly easily and that they're not much help otherwise.