http://forum.soft32.com/linux/Release-forum-38.html Top 15 Messages on forum.soft32.com http://forum.soft32.com/linux/binNMU-xz-utils-rdeps-ABI-change-ftopict499847.html#1251555 Hi again Jonathan Nieder wrote: > nmu lsb rpm_4 7 1 11 ALL m Rebuild against liblzma1 > nmu mupen64plus_1 5 dfsg1 7 ALL m Rebuild against liblzma1 > dw lsb rpm_4 7 1 11 mupen64plus_1 5 dfsg1 7 kfreebsd i386 m liblzma1 Erm there was a typo there nmu rpm_4 7 1 11 ALL m Rebuild against liblzma1 nmu mupen64plus_1 5 dfsg1 7 ALL m Rebuild against http://forum.soft32.com/linux/libbio-samtools-perl-migrated-testing-build-dependancy-libba-ftopict499527.html#1251414 severity 544976 important thanks Le Sun Nov 15 2009 at 03:27:04PM 0100 Luk Claes a crit : > Charles Plessy wrote: > > > libbam dev contains a static library built with fPIC and since some people > > raised concerns about security on devel that were not contradicted by the > > release or security teams I opened a RC bug against it to prevent its > > migration to testing I w http://forum.soft32.com/linux/oldstable-mt-daapd-update-addressing-555231-ftopict499235.html#1251078 Adam D Barratt wrote: Hi > Thanks for the confirmation Please go ahead with the upload for > oldstable Uploaded Haven t got a message from the queue daemon about it so hope everything went OK with that If you don t see the files anywhere let me know JB Julien BLACHE | Debian because code matters more De http://forum.soft32.com/linux/Migration-Scilab-testing-ftopict496075.html#1247481 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le dimanche 18 octobre 2009 14:54 0200 Luk Claes a crit : >> Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>> On Sat 17 Oct 2009 11:33:11 0200 Luk Claes wrote: >>> >>>> Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>>> Hello >>> >>>>> I have a migration unstable => testing issue with Scilab I would like >>>>> to see it into testing but for now it does not respect the rule > http://forum.soft32.com/linux/Slim-stable-sec-bugs-ftopict496305.html#1245233 2009 10 17 Luk Claes : > Mike Massonnet wrote: >> Hi >> >> The package slim after a long I don t care is still packaged and >> available for debian stable The latest concern about this package was >> about two three voices to throw it out of the archive Seems I need to >> bitch about that fact otherwise it will still be available for many >> years >> >> If by a http://forum.soft32.com/linux/hint-flash-kernel-23-ftopict497106.html#1244993 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Please hint flash kernel 2 23 into testing It adds support for two > new devices It has been in unstable for over 2 weeks but won t move > automatically because of the udeb udeb unblocked Cheers Luk To UNSUBSCRIBE email to debian release REQUEST@lists debian org with a subject of unsubscribe Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists debian org http://forum.soft32.com/linux/binNMU-python-qscintilla2-sip-ftopict497072.html#1244950 Peter Fritzsche wrote: > Hi > all packages against python qscintilla2 doesn t start anymore because it uses > an old api version of sip which gets rejected: > RuntimeError: the sip module implements API v6 0 but the PyQt4 Qsci module requires API v5 0 > > nmu qscintilla2_2 4 3 ALL m Rebuild against new python sip4 see 550570 New version got uploaded in the mean time Ch http://forum.soft32.com/linux/open-issues-hppa-port-ftopict490405.html#1243943 On Fri Oct 9 2009 at 4:37 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > Carlos O Donell: > >> The nptl enabled hppa libc packages are in experimental >> e g >> apt get t experimental install libc6 > > Out of curiosity does this version support cross process mutexes? Yes two applications that are compiled for NPTL can share a mutex via shared memory by using pthread_mutexatt http://forum.soft32.com/linux/objections-port-maintainers-make-gcc-default-ftopict494959.html#1243089 On Mon Sep 21 2009 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Please note that building glibc with gcc 4 4 on armel shows an important > regression the resulting libc so 6 is non PIC I haven t been able to > reproduce it with other programs though > > I don t think it should prevent the switch to gcc 4 4 but we should > probably pay more attention to the binaries built after the switch This iss http://forum.soft32.com/linux/postfix-update-stable-ftopict494808.html#1241393 LaMont Jones wrote: Sorry for the late reply > After discussions with the affected security teams debian and ubuntu > postfix 2 6 5 3 was uploaded to sid with the presumption that I would > contact release to get the fix for my ancient screwup into the next > point release > > SECURITY UPDATE: correct permissions on var spool postfix pid > adjust var spool postfi http://forum.soft32.com/linux/Webinar-free-sign-Google-ranking-Top-10-SEO-Tools-ftopict495719.html#1241290 Good day I came across your company in my research on potential firms and marketers ad agencies PR firms that may be active in Internet Marketing including S E O or Search Engine Optimization for ranking higher on Google I d like to invite you to my upcoming free webinar on the Top Ten Free Tools for S E O Google Rank being held online on Oct 8th and 12th The webinar http://forum.soft32.com/linux/Lenny-point-release-listed-web-site-ftopict494554.html#1238024 On Wed Sep 16 2009 at 12:12:18PM 0200 Frans Pop wrote: > 5 0 3 is still missing from the errata page: > http: www debian org releases stable errata pointrelease Thanks that will be fixed at next website build Cheers Simon Paillard To UNSUBSCRIBE email to debian release REQUEST@lists debian org with a subject of unsubscribe Trouble? Contact listmaster@li http://forum.soft32.com/linux/update-proftpd-lenny-ftopict493754.html#1235910 Hi SRMs As reflected in http: bugs proftpd org show_bug cgi?id=3284 upstream has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively impacts its performances I would be inclined to propose a PU but I d like having an ok by SRMs before working on it Francesco P Lovergine To UNSUBSCRIBE email to debian release REQUEST@lists debian org with a subject of http://forum.soft32.com/linux/ltsp-83-testing-ftopict493149.html#1235758 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > ltsp 5 1 83 1 is blocked from migrating into testing due to the > ltsp client builder udeb though this udeb is not used by debian installer by > default and has no changes since the previous version > > it has been in unstable for 7 days without introducing new problems unblocked Cheers Luk To UNSUBSCRIBE email to debian release REQUEST@ http://forum.soft32.com/linux/binNMU-soprano-strigi-current-libclucene0ldbl-kfreebsd-ftopict493426.html#1235060 Petr Salinger a crit : > Hi > > on both kfreebsd i386 and kfreebsd amd64 the latest build of > soprano and strigi have been against broken clucene core_0 9 21b 1 > The linux architectures seems unaffected They are unaffected because binNMU have already been scheduled on those architecture kfreebsd amd64 and kfreebsd i386 have been forgotten > Please schedule binNMU for them