Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes

 
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Documentations RSS
Next:  FYI: Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes..  
Author Message
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:20 pm
Post subject: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes
Archived from groups: linux>debian>doc (more info?)

[Sent first mail, before it was ready. Sorry.]

Hello,

could a native Englishperson please proof-read the Debian 5.0
("lenny") release notes and send a list of errors to
debian-doc.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org? Unfortunately it's too late to fix
any style issues — only real, ugly errors can be fixed. We don't
want to make translators lives even harder, don't we?

Find the release notes on the web:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes
Or in Subversion:
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes

Many thanks in advance!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:20 pm
Post subject: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hello,

could a native Englishperson please proof-read the Debian 5.0
("lenny") release notes and send a list of errors to
debian-doc RemoveThis @lists.debian.org? Unfortunately it's too late to fix
any style issues — only real, ugly errors can be fixed. We don't
want to make translators lives even harder, don't we?

Many thanks in advance!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Justin B Rye

External


Since: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 15



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

W. Martin Borgert called attention to:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes

I'm working on it, but since it's 02:00 here I think I'd better save
the rest for tomorrow. Commentary so far:

In the first couple of chapters I see a few places where I'd have
added or subtracted commas, but nothing really non-native-speakerish
and nothing that makes a difference to the meaning.

Are you localising or localizing? Either way, there are several
discrepancies, probably best caught by ispell.

3.1.1 has a couple of mildly odd phrasings, but only one outright
mistake: s/optionnally/optionally/.

4.4 has a slightly ungrammatical bit of phrasing: "by both its
codename [...] and by its status name". It's clear what's intended,
but to fix it either drop the second "by" or move the first to after
the "both".

4.4.2 refers twice to "packages mirrors". Intelligible, but should
be "package mirrors".

4.5.1 has "a NFS mount" (s/a/an/) and "whatever filesystem that is
mounted on your system" (s/that //); definite errors, but with no
risk of unclarity.

Here come the first of the content issues:

4.5.6 has what looks like a rather old list of "packages obsoleted
in lenny" (almost all of them vanished in etch) and promises a more
complete list in 4.11 - there's no such list.

4.5.6.1 (and footnote 6) talks about starting a desktop upgrade by
installing xlibmesa-glu, but that's a sarge-to-etch transitional
package.

4.5.7 talks about etch 2.6.8 kernels. Wouldn't those have to be
from sarge? Has this warning been fact-checked?

4.5.9 talks about the new package signature checking mechanism.
Does it mean the archive keyring setup, already in etch?

4.5.10 (back to l10n-english!) has a non-native-speakerish sentence:
"You can work around that by specifying -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=1
option on aptitude command line." Make that: "You can work around
this by specifying the option -o APT::Force-LoopBreak=1 on the
aptitude command line."

4.6.1 has warnings about the move from a "-386" kernel flavour to
"-486". That was a sarge-to-etch change.

4.6.4 talks about /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules - I
hope we're taking into account the fact that lenny's udev has
switched the path to /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules...

4.7.2 deals with the difficulties of upgrading to mdadm 2.5.3; etch
already had 2.5.6, so I strongly suspect this is stale.

4.8.1 expands UUID as "universal unique identifier" - s/al/ally/.
It also has persistent misspellings: s/eg./e.g./g and s/ie./i.e./g

4.8.2.1 has a phrase with two missing articles (though it's still
intelligible): "If such menu does not appear, try pressing Esc key"
^a ^the
(In fact, "foo key" should be "the foo key" throughout 4.8.2.1)

4.8.2.2 has "a Debian GNU/Linux installation media" (drop "a")
followed by "when prompt" (s/prompt/prompted/) - it's not hard to
guess what's intended there, but it's the closest to a real problem
in the English so far. In fact 4.8.2.2 is pretty wobbly throughout.
"Shouldn't arm your partitions"? "You will be proposed among
several actions"? Oof, that's got to go. Here's a revised version
of the whole section:

Boot from Debian GNU/Linux installation media (CD/DVD), and when
prompted, type 'rescue' to launch rescue mode. Select your
language, location, and keyboard mapping; then let it configure the
network (no matter whether it succeeds or not). After a while, you
should be asked to select the partition you want to use as the root
file system. The proposed choices will look something like:

/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6

If you know which partition is your root file system, choose the
appropriate one. If you don't, just try the first. If it complains
about an invalid root file system partition, try the next one, and
so on. Trying one after the other shouldn't harm your partitions
and if you have only one operating system installed on your disks,
you should easily find the right root file system partition. If
you have many operating systems installed on your disks, it would
be better to know exactly which is the right partition.

Once you have choosen a partition, you will be offered a range of
options. Pick the option of executing a shell in the selected
partition. If it complains that it cannot do that then try with
another partition.

Now you should have shell access as user root on your root file
system mounted on /. You need access to the contents of the /boot,
/sbin and /usr directories. If these directories need to be mounted
from other partitions, do so (see /etc/fstab if you have no idea of
which partition to mount).

Jump to Section 4.8.1, "How to avoid the problem before upgrading"
and apply one of the two proposed procedures to fix the problem
permanently. Then type 'exit' to leave the rescue shell and select
'reboot' for rebooting the system as usual (don't forget to remove
the bootable media).

4.8.2.3 stage one: "and many other" is intelligible but wrong; I'd
recommend making it "(such as Debian Live, Knoppix, or Ubuntu
Live)".

4.10 - purely a suggestion, but all those lilo refugees might
welcome advance warning of the grub2 migration...

4.12 is "world domination", right? Or is that Debian Zurg?

--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-26 02:05, Justin B Rye wrote:
> I'm working on it, but since it's 02:00 here I think I'd better save
> the rest for tomorrow. Commentary so far:

Thanks very much! I will work through your comments tonight.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Justin B Rye

External


Since: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 15



(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> W. Martin Borgert called attention to:
>> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes

Continued. I'd be using the SVN edition, but I hardly understand
the first thing about version control systems...

Chapter 5:

5.1.9's checklist isn't quite a grammatical sentence, but you can
probably get away with that.

5.2.3 talks about alsa-base configuration needing either hotplug or
discover installed. Lenny has no such package as hotplug, and its
alsa-base Depends on discover. Stale?

5.6 has some phrasing I'm worried about for a new and different
reason: I'm not sure what it means. In the clause "when it is not
in use", what is "it"? The computer? Network Manager? NIS client
functionality? (It might be easier to guess if the explanation
used some clearer description than "not in use".)

5.7 uses "respective" in an un-anglophone way. Substitute
"appropriate". But there's also a reference to php4, so please
also check whether this whole item is stale.

5.10 has a misplaced apostrophe: "in user's home directories".
Plural users, so "in users' home directories". What's this about
GTK1.2 being fully maintained? Then why
http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals ?

6.3 (last paragraph): what's this about "reference cards" in
/usr/share/doc/debian? I see no cards here! Does it mean
/usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt?

Appendices:

A.1 talks about the package list containing "etch packages" - is
that a typo for something like "etch lines"? "etch references"?

Now, that was i386/release-notes. How do I check for divergences in
other architectures?
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-26 02:05, Justin B Rye wrote:
> I'm working on it, but since it's 02:00 here I think I'd better save
> the rest for tomorrow. Commentary so far:

OK, I believe it's all in. Many thanks!

Now I'm going to next chunk, it's not even 1:00 here :~)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-26 19:49, Justin B Rye wrote:
> 5.1.9's checklist isn't quite a grammatical sentence, but you can
> probably get away with that.

If you don't mind, please give me a hint to fix it anyway.

> 5.2.3 talks about alsa-base configuration needing either hotplug or
> discover installed. Lenny has no such package as hotplug, and its
> alsa-base Depends on discover. Stale?

Hm, alsa-base conflicts with certain versions of discover, but
which Depends do you mean?

> 5.6 has some phrasing I'm worried about for a new and different
> reason: I'm not sure what it means. In the clause "when it is not
> in use", what is "it"? The computer? Network Manager? NIS client
> functionality? (It might be easier to guess if the explanation
> used some clearer description than "not in use".)

Good question. I believe(!), it's "Network Manager". Could
people shed light on the issue?

> 5.7 uses "respective" in an un-anglophone way. Substitute
> "appropriate". But there's also a reference to php4, so please
> also check whether this whole item is stale.

Removed the whole section.

> 5.10 has a misplaced apostrophe: "in user's home directories".
> Plural users, so "in users' home directories". What's this about
> GTK1.2 being fully maintained? Then why
> http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals ?

I believe(!), everything but the last paragraph from this
section can be removed.

> 6.3 (last paragraph): what's this about "reference cards" in
> /usr/share/doc/debian? I see no cards here! Does it mean
> /usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt?

Mystic. No idea. Seems to be in the release notes since long
time. Maybe "reference documentation"?

> A.1 talks about the package list containing "etch packages" - is
> that a typo for something like "etch lines"? "etch references"?

Changed to "references to etch". OK?

> Now, that was i386/release-notes. How do I check for divergences in
> other architectures?

You can now build the release notes with architecture=all, which
is just a pseudonym for including all conditional text:

$ make txt LINGUA=en architecture=all

Thanks again for your help!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Justin B Rye

External


Since: Nov 13, 2008
Posts: 15



(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

(For some reason I didn't get a copy via debian-l10n-english, so
apologies for any odd headers in this faked-up "reply".)

"W. Martin Borgert" <debacle RemoveThis @debian.org> wrote:
> On 2009-01-26 19:49, Justin B Rye wrote:
>> 5.1.9's checklist isn't quite a grammatical sentence, but you can
>> probably get away with that.
>
> If you don't mind, please give me a hint to fix it anyway.

-In rare cases the sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
+In rare cases, sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
this happens, go through the alsa checklist: run alsaconf as root
-user, add your user to the audio group, use alsamixer and make sure
-levels are up and it is unmuted, make sure arts or esound stopped,
-make sure OSS modules unloaded, make sure speakers are on, check
+user; add your user to the audio group; use alsamixer to make sure
+levels are up and it is unmuted; make sure arts and esound are not running;
+make sure no OSS modules are loaded; make sure the speakers are on; and check
whether the command cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp works for root.

>> 5.2.3 talks about alsa-base configuration needing either hotplug or
>> discover installed. Lenny has no such package as hotplug, and its
>> alsa-base Depends on discover. Stale?
>
> Hm, alsa-base conflicts with certain versions of discover, but
> which Depends do you mean?

Oh! Sorry, my mistake, I saw it in "apt-cache rdepends discover"
and didn't think to double-check.

>> 6.3 (last paragraph): what's this about "reference cards" in
>> /usr/share/doc/debian? I see no cards here! Does it mean
>> /usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt?
>
> Mystic. No idea. Seems to be in the release notes since long
> time. Maybe "reference documentation"?

Sounds fine.

>> A.1 talks about the package list containing "etch packages" - is
>> that a typo for something like "etch lines"? "etch references"?
>
> Changed to "references to etch". OK?

Sounds fine.

>> Now, that was i386/release-notes. How do I check for divergences in
>> other architectures?
>
> You can now build the release notes with architecture=all, which
> is just a pseudonym for including all conditional text:
>
> $ make txt LINGUA=en architecture=all

First I'll need to brush up on which end of a Subversion source
repository is which.
--
JBR For trifling occasions it is better to accomplish things
simply by yelling - "Hagakure", Yamamoto Tsunetomo (1716)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-27 02:38, Justin B Rye wrote:
> -In rare cases the sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
> +In rare cases, sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
> this happens, go through the alsa checklist: run alsaconf as root
> -user, add your user to the audio group, use alsamixer and make sure
> -levels are up and it is unmuted, make sure arts or esound stopped,
> -make sure OSS modules unloaded, make sure speakers are on, check
> +user; add your user to the audio group; use alsamixer to make sure
> +levels are up and it is unmuted; make sure arts and esound are not running;
> +make sure no OSS modules are loaded; make sure the speakers are on; and check
> whether the command cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp works for root.

That paragraph has already been changed. Is this better?

5.1.9.Sound stops working
In rare cases, sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
this happens, go through the alsa checklist:
● run alsaconf as root user,
● add your user to the audio group,
● use alsamixer to make sure, that the sound channel levels are
up and unmuted,
● that arts or esound are not running,
● that no OSS modules are loaded, and
● the speakers are actually switched on.
● Check whether the command
cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp
works for root.

Many thanks again!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-27 07:04, Christian Perrier wrote:
> We don't want our Release Notes to speak Frenglish, do we?

That would make a nice exception from our typical denglisch or
casteyanqui/espangls/inglaol :~)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Ben Finney

External


Since: May 12, 2005
Posts: 55



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"W. Martin Borgert" <debacle.DeleteThis@debian.org> writes:

> 5.1.9.Sound stops working
> In rare cases, sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
> this happens, go through the alsa checklist:

The name of the system is "ALSA", all capitals because it's an
acronym. So, "the ALSA checklist".

--
\ Q: "I've heard that Linux causes cancer..." Torvalds: "That's a |
`\ filthy lie. Besides, it was only in rats and has not been |
_o__) reproduced in humans." —Linus Torvalds |
Ben Finney


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Justin B Rye

External


Since: Jan 27, 2009
Posts: 1



(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

(Still no mail... looks like the edlug.org.uk mailrelay's down.
Maybe it's connected to the string of local power outages we had
last night. I'll switch to xibalba.demon.co.uk.)

W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> That paragraph has already been changed. Is this better?
>
> 5.1.9. Sound stops working
> In rare cases, sound might stop working after the upgrade. If
> this happens, go through the alsa checklist:
> ● run alsaconf as root user,
> ● add your user to the audio group,
> ● use alsamixer to make sure, that the sound channel levels are
> up and unmuted,
> ● that arts or esound are not running,
> ● that no OSS modules are loaded, and
> ● the speakers are actually switched on.
> ● Check whether the command
> cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp
> works for root.

Better, but eliding "make sure" like that implies that you're using
alsamixer to make sure of each of the following things.

● run alsaconf as root user,
● add your user to the audio group,
● make sure the sound channel levels are up and unmuted (using alsamixer),
● make sure arts and esound are not running,
● make sure no OSS modules are loaded,
● make sure the speakers are actually switched on, and
● check whether the command
cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp
works for root.

--
JBR


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino

External


Since: Jan 27, 2009
Posts: 3



(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:20 am
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

2009/1/26 W. Martin Borgert <debacle.TakeThisOut@debian.org>:
> We don't
> want to make translators lives even harder, don't we?

Quite sincerely, after the reports I've seen in the BTS, as well as in
replies to this request which affect *content* and not *wording* it
really looks like the release notes are not ready for prime time and
that the call for translation updates should have been hold.
Translators are going to suffer *a*lot* because of this last minute
changes.

I am in the process of reviewing Lenny's release notes' translations
to Spanish and I have been quite surprised when I found that there are
many things in them which refer to a sarge -> etch release which are
not any more relevant in lenny.

Has anyone done test upgrades from one distribution to the other
(using different default installs: bare installation, desktop,
server..) to try to see which of the steps described in the release
notes is no longer relevant? I did many of those two years ago for the
etch release and reviewed the RN based on that experience. It looks
like this has not been done by any of the (current) editors of the
Release Notes.


Regards

Javier


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Simon Paillard

External


Since: Nov 21, 2006
Posts: 47



(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> 2009/1/26 W. Martin Borgert <debacle RemoveThis @debian.org>:
> > We don't
> > want to make translators lives even harder, don't we?
>
> Quite sincerely, after the reports I've seen in the BTS, as well as in
> replies to this request which affect *content* and not *wording* it
> really looks like the release notes are not ready for prime time and
> that the call for translation updates should have been hold.
> Translators are going to suffer *a*lot* because of this last minute
> changes.

I have to agree with Javier.
Personally, I will hold my translation of release-notes until they are
freezed.

And focus on reviewing the english part before the translation is done.
Unfortunately, that will affect people translating (unless we tell them
to hold their translation, or at least part of the release-notes subject
to deep changes).

> I am in the process of reviewing Lenny's release notes' translations
> to Spanish and I have been quite surprised when I found that there are
> many things in them which refer to a sarge -> etch release which are
> not any more relevant in lenny.

Though it was already advertised in mails from the release team, would a
another mail to d-d-a relevant to ask for bugs+patch against
release-notes concerning etch->lenny upgrades ?

> Has anyone done test upgrades from one distribution to the other
> (using different default installs: bare installation, desktop,
> server..) to try to see which of the steps described in the release
> notes is no longer relevant? I did many of those two years ago for the
> etch release and reviewed the RN based on that experience. It looks
> like this has not been done by any of the (current) editors of the
> Release Notes.

Was more focused on translation only initially...

--
Simon Paillard


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
W. Martin Borgert

External


Since: Aug 06, 2007
Posts: 90



(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Please proof-read Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release notes [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2009-01-27 11:54, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Better, but eliding "make sure" like that implies that you're using
> alsamixer to make sure of each of the following things.
....

OK, done! Many thanks.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Release notes for website - I made some recent changes to the release notes build system, this should allow them to now be integrated with the..

typo on release notes - Hope this is the right address to comment on... http://www.debian.org/News/2005/20050606 Towards the bottom of the..

Etch release notes - Please begin building the etch release notes automatically for /releases/etch/releasenotes. (The should be built from..

Problem building release notes? - Could someone check that the release notes are building correctly. The version currently available is from the..

Status of release notes build - It seems that the release notes aren't building, or, possibly not bulding very often... Can someone remind me of when...

Release notes build request - Please switch the sarge release notes to using the sarge branch and start building for etch from HEAD. Once this is..
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Documentations All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]