Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Question abot DTDDECL and SGMLDECL

  
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> SGML RSS
Next:  privately tubular  
Author Message
Daniel Leidert

External


Since: Dec 15, 2006
Posts: 47



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:52 pm
Post subject: Question abot DTDDECL and SGMLDECL
Archived from groups: linux>debian>maint>sgml (more info?)
Hi,

I hope, a few people are still reading this list Smile My question: What
goes wrong? The docbook-xml SGML catalogs contain a DTDDECL entry

DTDDECL "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
"/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"

If I do a

onsgmls -E1 -wxml -wall -gues test-4.5.xml

with a simple DB 4.5 XML file, it fails. If I add a SGMLDECL entry:

SGMLDECL "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"

it succeeds. Why does it fail in the first case? The PUBIDs are the same
in the DTDDECL and the testfile DOCTYPE. If there is some documentation
out there, that can explain my question, please don't hesitate to point
me to it.

Regards, Daniel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Neil Roeth

External


Since: Oct 10, 2003
Posts: 30



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:00 pm
Post subject: Question abot DTDDECL and SGMLDECL [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Apr 18, Daniel Leidert (daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope, a few people are still reading this list Smile My question: What
> goes wrong? The docbook-xml SGML catalogs contain a DTDDECL entry
>
> DTDDECL "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
> "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
>
> If I do a
>
> onsgmls -E1 -wxml -wall -gues test-4.5.xml
>
> with a simple DB 4.5 XML file, it fails. If I add a SGMLDECL entry:
>
> SGMLDECL "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
>
> it succeeds. Why does it fail in the first case? The PUBIDs are the same
> in the DTDDECL and the testfile DOCTYPE. If there is some documentation
> out there, that can explain my question, please don't hesitate to point
> me to it.
>
> Regards, Daniel

Simply because the debian version was built with the config option
--disable-dtddecl. That was done for performance reasons, enabling DTDDECLs
makes opensp and openjade take literally ten to twenty times as long as with
it turned off. See bugs 138924 and 208042.

--
Neil Roeth


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Daniel Leidert

External


Since: Dec 15, 2006
Posts: 47



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:50 am
Post subject: Re: Question abot DTDDECL and SGMLDECL [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 21:37 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth:
> On Apr 18, Daniel Leidert (daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hope, a few people are still reading this list Smile My question: What
> > goes wrong? The docbook-xml SGML catalogs contain a DTDDECL entry
> >
> > DTDDECL "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
> > "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
> >
> > If I do a
> >
> > onsgmls -E1 -wxml -wall -gues test-4.5.xml
> >
> > with a simple DB 4.5 XML file, it fails. If I add a SGMLDECL entry:
> >
> > SGMLDECL "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
> >
> > it succeeds. Why does it fail in the first case? The PUBIDs are the same
> > in the DTDDECL and the testfile DOCTYPE. If there is some documentation
> > out there, that can explain my question, please don't hesitate to point
> > me to it.
> >
> > Regards, Daniel
>
> Simply because the debian version was built with the config option
> --disable-dtddecl. That was done for performance reasons, enabling DTDDECLs
> makes opensp and openjade take literally ten to twenty times as long as with
> it turned off. See bugs 138924 and 208042.

Thanks for the info. Would it make sense to mention this somewhere in
the onsgmls man-page? Under BUGS or in a section LIMITATIONS (following
the man-page how to)? This could also be a reasonable solution for
http://bugs.debian.org/345478.

Regards, Daniel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Neil Roeth

External


Since: Oct 10, 2003
Posts: 30



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:30 am
Post subject: Re: Question abot DTDDECL and SGMLDECL [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Apr 19, Daniel Leidert (daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net) wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 21:37 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth:
> > On Apr 18, Daniel Leidert (daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net) wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I hope, a few people are still reading this list Smile My question: What
> > > goes wrong? The docbook-xml SGML catalogs contain a DTDDECL entry
> > >
> > > DTDDECL "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"
> > > "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
> > >
> > > If I do a
> > >
> > > onsgmls -E1 -wxml -wall -gues test-4.5.xml
> > >
> > > with a simple DB 4.5 XML file, it fails. If I add a SGMLDECL entry:
> > >
> > > SGMLDECL "/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl"
> > >
> > > it succeeds. Why does it fail in the first case? The PUBIDs are the same
> > > in the DTDDECL and the testfile DOCTYPE. If there is some documentation
> > > out there, that can explain my question, please don't hesitate to point
> > > me to it.
> > >
> > > Regards, Daniel
> >
> > Simply because the debian version was built with the config option
> > --disable-dtddecl. That was done for performance reasons, enabling DTDDECLs
> > makes opensp and openjade take literally ten to twenty times as long as with
> > it turned off. See bugs 138924 and 208042.
>
> Thanks for the info. Would it make sense to mention this somewhere in
> the onsgmls man-page? Under BUGS or in a section LIMITATIONS (following
> the man-page how to)? This could also be a reasonable solution for
> http://bugs.debian.org/345478.
>
> Regards, Daniel

Yes, it would. Thanks for the suggestion.

--
Neil Roeth


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sgml-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Question - Hello... I was wondering if you are EVER planning to update your site and make it more userfriendly and more pleasing...

Question - Hello I would like to ask if there is Debian DVD iso to download by HTTP sites or FTP servers. I couldn't find any. I...

[QUESTION] - Allrighy, Since somebody up there hates me and passed me a cool fever with a body temperature of 39C I'll stay in bed,...

Question - I have posted opinions on what the ceo of RH had stated to ZDNET in the past not as a troll but to get some honest..

another little question ! - Hi again how is it possible to mount an USB memory stick on linux ? and what about an USB scanner ? thank you

question - wich version of redhat , fedora is better for running on X desktop whit recent computer... redhat 7,3 - 8 - 9 ? fedor...
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> SGML All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA

[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]