Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

[Samba] Old application very slow

 
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Samba RSS
Next:  Bug#551004:  
Author Message
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:20 am
Post subject: [Samba] Old application very slow
Archived from groups: linux>samba (more info?)

Hi,
This weekend I migrated a samba-server to new hardware and software :
I'm running samba 3.2.7-11.3.2 on Opensuse 11.1.
Everything works fine I believe except for an old DOS-application,
written in Clipper. It's too slow to be usable. I tried to debug this
but I'm stuck.
I put the loglevel to 10, but I can't see anything wrong.
I first added to veto oplock files : *.dbf/*.ntx/, no effect.
I didn't have oplocks off, but now I disabled them, with no effect.
I moved all files to another share (from Data to Applic) with no effect.
Am I right that if I wait long enough (few minutes) the modified config
is read without interupting the services ?

I hope someone can point me in the right direction.

Koenraad Lelong.

This is the important part of my config :
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
server string = Samba on %L
interfaces = 192.168.0.0/20, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes
passdb backend = tdbsam
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*Password* %n\n *Re-enter*new*password*%n\n
*Password*changed*
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
unix password sync = Yes
lanman auth = Yes
client lanman auth = Yes
client plaintext auth = Yes
log level = 10
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
max log size = 50
smb ports = 139
name resolve order = wins bcast hosts
time server = Yes
printcap name = CUPS
mangle prefix = 5
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m -s /bin/false '%u'
delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r '%u'
add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd '%g' && getent group '%g'|awk -F:
'{print $3}'
delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel '%g'
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/groupmod -A '%u' '%g'
delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/groupmod -R '%u' '%g'
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/usermod -g '%g' '%u'
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody
-s /bin/false '%u'
shutdown script = /var/lib/samba/scripts/shutdown.sh
abort shutdown script = /sbin /shutdown -c
logon script = scripts\%U.bat
logon drive = F:
logon home = \\lace2\%U
domain logons = Yes
os level = 65
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
ldap ssl = no
utmp = Yes
create mask = 0664
force create mode = 0660
directory mask = 0777
force directory mode = 0770
map acl inherit = Yes
cups options = Raw
printer name = LJ4050
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/*.{*}/Thumbs.db/
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.xls/*.mdb/*.dbf/*.ntx/
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
browseable = No

[printers]
comment = SMB Print Spool
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
printer name =
use client driver = Yes
browseable = No

[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
admin users = Koenraad
write list = root
guest ok = Yes
browseable = No
locking = No

[profiles]
comment = Profile Share
path = /var/lib/samba/profiles
read only = No
profile acls = Yes

[Data]
comment = Data schijf
path = /net/Data
read only = No
acl group control = Yes
dos filemode = Yes

[Applic]
comment = Applicatie schijf
path = /net/Applic
read only = No

This is part of a logfile of the PC I'm using :

[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(337)
change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(1118)
got smb length of 45
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1547)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x2d
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1550)
Transaction 516199 of length 49 (0 toread)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(647)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(657)
size=45
smb_com=0xa
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=32768
smb_tid=6
smb_pid=4842
smb_uid=104
smb_mid=1666
smt_wct=5
smb_vwv[ 0]= 6473 (0x1949)
smb_vwv[ 1]= 12 (0xC)
smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 3]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 4]= 12 (0xC)
smb_bcc=0
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1361)
switch message SMBread (pid 28121) conn 0xb80b3780
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(324)
setting sec ctx (1007, 1003) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] auth/token_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(472)
NT user token of user S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-1012
contains 12 SIDs
SID[ 0]: S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-1012
SID[ 1]: S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-1120
SID[ 2]: S-1-1-0
SID[ 3]: S-1-5-2
SID[ 4]: S-1-5-11
SID[ 5]: S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-513
SID[ 6]: S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-3015
SID[ 7]: S-1-5-21-177555115-702490737-1861429907-3017
SID[ 8]: S-1-22-2-1003
SID[ 9]: S-1-22-2-100
SID[ 10]: S-1-22-2-1007
SID[ 11]: S-1-22-2-1008
SE_PRIV 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] auth/token_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(492)
UNIX token of user 1007
Primary group is 1003 and contains 4 supplementary groups
Group[ 0]: 1003
Group[ 1]: 100
Group[ 2]: 1007
Group[ 3]: 1008
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(322)
change_to_user uid=(0,1007) gid=(0,1003)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(9Cool
is_locked: optimisation - exclusive oplock on file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(136)
is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=0 len=12 unlocked for
fnum 6473 file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] smbd/fileio.c:read_file(104)
read_file (ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX): pos = 0, size = 12, returned 12
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_read(3123)
read fnum=6473 num=12 nread=12
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(647)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(657)
size=60
smb_com=0xa
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=128
smb_flg2=32769
smb_tid=6
smb_pid=4842
smb_uid=104
smb_mid=1666
smt_wct=5
smb_vwv[ 0]= 12 (0xC)
smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 3]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0)
smb_bcc=15
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(2231)
[000] 01 0C 00 06 00 01 00 00 FC 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ .......
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(1118)
got smb length of 51
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1547)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x33
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1550)
Transaction 516200 of length 55 (0 toread)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(647)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(657)
size=51
smb_com=0x1a
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=32768
smb_tid=6
smb_pid=4842
smb_uid=104
smb_mid=1794
smt_wct=8
smb_vwv[ 0]= 6472 (0x1948)
smb_vwv[ 1]=39658 (0x9AEA)
smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 3]= 61 (0x3D)
smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 7]= 0 (0x0)
smb_bcc=0
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1361)
switch message SMBreadbraw (pid 28121) conn 0xb80b3780
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(225)
change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(9Cool
is_locked: optimisation - exclusive oplock on file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(136)
is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=39658 len=61 unlocked for
fnum 6472 file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2924)
reply_readbraw: fnum=6472 start=39658 max=61 min=0 nread=61
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] smbd/fileio.c:read_file(104)
read_file (ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF): pos = 39658, size = 61, returned 61
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2928)
reply_readbraw finished
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(1118)
got smb length of 51
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1547)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x33
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1550)
Transaction 516201 of length 55 (0 toread)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(647)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(657)
size=51
smb_com=0x1a
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=32768
smb_tid=6
smb_pid=4842
smb_uid=104
smb_mid=1922
smt_wct=8
smb_vwv[ 0]= 6472 (0x1948)
smb_vwv[ 1]=39658 (0x9AEA)
smb_vwv[ 2]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 3]= 61 (0x3D)
smb_vwv[ 4]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 5]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 6]= 0 (0x0)
smb_vwv[ 7]= 0 (0x0)
smb_bcc=0
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(1361)
switch message SMBreadbraw (pid 28121) conn 0xb80b3780
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 4] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(225)
change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(9Cool
is_locked: optimisation - exclusive oplock on file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(136)
is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=39658 len=61 unlocked for
fnum 6472 file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2924)
reply_readbraw: fnum=6472 start=39658 max=61 min=0 nread=61
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] smbd/fileio.c:read_file(104)
read_file (ACE/TIKKLOK/PCB.DBF): pos = 39658, size = 61, returned 61
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] smbd/reply.c:reply_readbraw(2928)
reply_readbraw finished
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(1118)
got smb length of 45
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1547)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x2d
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1550)
Transaction 516202 of length 49 (0 toread)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(647)
[2009/10/19 14:45:28, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(657)
size=45
smb_com=0xd
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=32768
smb_tid=6
smb_pid=4842
smb_uid=104
smb_mid=2050
smt_wct=5
smb_vwv[ 0]= 6473 (0x1949)
smb_vwv[ 1]= 1 (0x1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Adam Williams

External


Since: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: 60



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

you might try adding:

socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_KEEPALIVE READ_SIZE=65536

use mmap = No
use sendfile = Yes
blocking locks = No
read raw = no
write raw = no

kernel oplocks = no
oplocks = yes
level2 oplocks = yes


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Michael Wood

External


Since: Aug 28, 2009
Posts: 2



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

2009/10/19 Koenraad Lelong <samba.k.lelong.TakeThisOut@ace-electronics.be>:
> Hi,
> This weekend I migrated a samba-server to new hardware and software : I'm
> running samba 3.2.7-11.3.2 on Opensuse 11.1.
> Everything works fine I believe except for an old DOS-application, written
> in Clipper. It's too slow to be usable. I tried to debug this but I'm stuck.
> I put the loglevel to 10, but I can't see anything wrong.
> I first added to veto oplock files : *.dbf/*.ntx/, no effect.
[...]

Isn't that supposed to be "*.ndx"? I have no idea if it will make a
difference, though.

--
Michael Wood <esiotrot.TakeThisOut@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Adam Williams schreef:
> you might try adding:
>
> socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
> SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_KEEPALIVE READ_SIZE=65536
>
> use mmap = No
> use sendfile = Yes
> blocking locks = No
> read raw = no
> write raw = no
>
> kernel oplocks = no
> oplocks = yes
> level2 oplocks = yes
>
>
Thanks for your responses.
I tried some of those suggestions, others are recommended not to modify
in the documentations. But no improvement in speed.
I also dissolved the bond between two NIC's I had, with no solution.

Anyone has other suggestions ?

Regards,

Koenraad Lelong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Johan Hendriks

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 4



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

>Adam Williams schreef:
>> you might try adding:
>>
>> socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536
>> SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_KEEPALIVE READ_SIZE=65536
>>
>> use mmap = No
>> use sendfile = Yes
>> blocking locks = No
>> read raw = no
>> write raw = no
>>
>> kernel oplocks = no
>> oplocks = yes
>> level2 oplocks = yes
>>
>>
>Thanks for your responses.
>I tried some of those suggestions, others are recommended not to modify

>in the documentations. But no improvement in speed.
>I also dissolved the bond between two NIC's I had, with no solution.

>Anyone has other suggestions ?

>Regards,

>Koenraad Lelong.

A long shot,
interfaces = 192.168.0.0/20, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes

try to set interfaces to just the interface name and the ipadres.
Maybe it is a network problem.
Regards,
Johan


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.24/2449 - Release Date:
10/20/09 18:42:00
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Johan Hendriks schreef:
>
> A long shot,
> interfaces = 192.168.0.0/20, lo
> bind interfaces only = Yes
>
> try to set interfaces to just the interface name and the ipadres.
> Maybe it is a network problem.
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions, but it didn't help.

I'm setting up another samba-server to test.
In the mean time I tried the application on a linux-box with dosemu (it
is a DOS application). The linux-box is connected to the samba-server
with samba client-software.
Guess what : it's running like it should : very responsive.

What's this telling me ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Koenraad Lelong schreef:
> Johan Hendriks schreef:
>>
>> A long shot, interfaces = 192.168.0.0/20, lo
>> bind interfaces only = Yes
>>
>> try to set interfaces to just the interface name and the ipadres.
>> Maybe it is a network problem.
> Hi,
> Thanks for your suggestions, but it didn't help.
>
> I'm setting up another samba-server to test.
> In the mean time I tried the application on a linux-box with dosemu (it
> is a DOS application). The linux-box is connected to the samba-server
> with samba client-software.
> Guess what : it's running like it should : very responsive.
>
> What's this telling me ?

Hi,

I was looking at the samba-status with swat. When I run the application
with dosemu (i.e. fast respone), the database-files are opened with an
exclusive oplock. When I run the app in Windows, there is no (none)
oplock. Does this ring any bells ?

P.S. is it possible there's a bug in swat ? The headers of Open Files
are not all OK, and the user-id is not "reverse resolved". Or is it
Webmin that does this ?

Regards,
Koenraad Lelong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Koenraad Lelong schreef:
> Koenraad Lelong schreef:

>> Hi,
>> Thanks for your suggestions, but it didn't help.
>>
>> I'm setting up another samba-server to test.
>> In the mean time I tried the application on a linux-box with dosemu
>> (it is a DOS application). The linux-box is connected to the
>> samba-server with samba client-software.
>> Guess what : it's running like it should : very responsive.
>>
>> What's this telling me ?
>
Hi,

I think I have a (temporary ?) solution : if I enable "fake oplocks" the
application works fast. Since I was thinking of giving that application
and it's database-files it's own share I think it will work.
I don't like to give the other shares those fake oplocks.

Comments ?

Regards,

Koenraad Lelong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Volker Lendecke schreef:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:27:52PM +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
>> Koenraad Lelong schreef:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I have a (temporary ?) solution : if I enable "fake oplocks" the
>> application works fast. Since I was thinking of giving that application
>> and it's database-files it's own share I think it will work.
>> I don't like to give the other shares those fake oplocks.
>>
>> Comments ?
>
> If you guarantee that only one user will ever use that db
> simultaneously, you're probably fine. If you have multi-user
> access, "fake oplocks" will make the application eat your
> data.
>
> Volker
Hi Volker,

I know that, that's why I will give it a share of it's own. That
application is "write one/read many".

Is there an explanation for the fact that when I run the application in
dosemu on a linuxbox, the files are opened with an exclusive lock, while
under "regular Windows", the files are opened without locks ? And that's
on the same share.

Now that I think of it, I don't see any files opened with oplocks ! All
my locking options are default. Why are there no oplocks ?

Regards,

Koenraad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Koenraad Lelong

External


Since: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 11



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:20 am
Post subject: Re: [Samba] Old application very slow [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Volker Lendecke schreef:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
>> Now that I think of it, I don't see any files opened with oplocks ! All
>> my locking options are default. Why are there no oplocks ?
>
> Once more than one app opens a file r/w, or the same app
> opens a file twice, all oplocks are gone.
>
> Volker

Hi,

I was confused a while. I though no oplocks = "unsafe". But then I
realised that only that "fake oplocks" is unsafe. The fact that other
files are not oplocked means the files are not cached by the user, so
"safe".

Thanks for all your replies.


Koenraad Lelong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
[Samba] Re: Re: Your application - Wir haben Ihre e-mail erhalten. Vielen Dank. Ihr PixelPerfect Team -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the..

[Samba] Re: Re: Your application - GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: santino.cambria@leader.ch...

[Samba] Re: Re: Your application - GUTEN TAG! Manuel Staub arbeitet nicht mehr für DER LEADER. Ihr Mail wurde umgeleitet an: santino.cambria@leader.ch...

[Samba] Java Application and Samba 3.0.1 - Hello all, I am running Samba 3.0.1 and CUPS 1.1.19 on a production print server and have a problem with a commercial....

[Samba] Samba, Samba PDC and slow XP if user not in admin .. - Like many I ran into the slow winXP client when attached to a samba server. Access times were extremely slow and..

[Samba] very slow link between Win2k SP4 and Linux samba s.. - I've been experiencing an incredibly slow samba access from a Win2k SP4 client to a Linux samba server (Mandrake 9.0,....
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Samba All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]