Roy Schestowitz

In article <1xnbmqxx91wke$.dlg@this.domain.or.that>,
Don Zeigler <sitting.TakeThisOut@this.computer> wrote:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>
> > Roy's mass posts are unsolicited, bulk, and sent indiscriminately.
> > Hence, spam.
>
> You left out the next part: "Spamming remains economically viable because
> advertisers..." Key word, advertisers. What is Roy advertising?

You should have read farther down. There's a whole section about
non-commercial spam.


> And why are you Wintrolls the biggest whiners in the group?
>
> According to you, then, your buddy flatfish's numerous posts are spam also.
> Why don't you bitch about him?

Flatfish's posts are neither bulk nor sent indiscriminately.


--
--Tim Smith

Timmy wrote:

>Roy's mass posts are unsolicited,

So are your posts, Timmy.

>bulk,

Wrong.

>and sent indiscriminately.

Wrong.

>Hence, spam.

Hence, you are a trolling jackass.

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:05:32 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> Timmy wrote:
>
>>Roy's mass posts are unsolicited,
>
> So are your posts, Timmy.
>
>>bulk,
>
> Wrong.
>
>>and sent indiscriminately.
>
> Wrong.
>
>>Hence, spam.
>
> Hence, you are a trolling jackass.

Seconded.

--
C.O.L.A Charter:-
"For discussion of the benefits of GNU/Linux compared to other
operating systems."

Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Don Zeigler was heard to
say:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> Roy's mass posts are unsolicited, bulk, and sent indiscriminately.
>> Hence, spam.

Bullshit. Smith's an idiot.

> You left out the next part: "Spamming remains economically viable because
> advertisers..." Key word, advertisers. What is Roy advertising?

Nothing, hence why Smith's an idiot.

> And why are you Wintrolls the biggest whiners in the group?
>
> According to you, then, your buddy flatfish's numerous posts are spam also.
> Why don't you bitch about him?

Oh, no, no, nooo! Flatfish is a fellow wintroll, which is why the Hadron
troll says nothing about him either.

--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!

William Poaster wrote:
> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Don Zeigler was heard to
> say:
>
>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Roy's mass posts are unsolicited, bulk, and sent indiscriminately.
>>> Hence, spam.
>
> Bullshit. Smith's an idiot.

He's far, far more intelligent than you, Dumb Willie.

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:13:15 -0500, DFS wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Don Zeigler was heard to
>> say:
>>
>>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy's mass posts are unsolicited, bulk, and sent indiscriminately.
>>>> Hence, spam.
>>
>> Bullshit. Smith's an idiot.
>
> He's far, far more intelligent than you, Dumb Willie.

They are circling the wagons in order to protect comp.os.linux.advocacy's
resident spammer, Roy Schestowitz.

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:18 -0600, Terry Porter wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:05:32 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>
>> Timmy wrote:
>>
>>>Roy's mass posts are unsolicited,
>>
>> So are your posts, Timmy.
>>
>>>bulk,
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>>and sent indiscriminately.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>>>Hence, spam.
>>
>> Hence, you are a trolling jackass.
>
> Seconded.

Hint for Terry Porter: 3 comes after 2...

In article <hd1455$psv$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann DeleteThis @t-online.de> wrote:
> Timmy boy seems to also ignore that Roys posts are *welcomed* in COLA by
> the linux users. Posts which are welcomed are by definition not Spam and
> never can be

COLA Amnesia claims another victim. Note how Peter completely has
forgotten about the numerous Linux users here who have said they have
Roy's "news" posts filtered out.


--
--Tim Smith

Tim Smith wrote:

> In article <hd1455$psv$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann.TakeThisOut@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Timmy boy seems to also ignore that Roys posts are *welcomed* in COLA
>> by the linux users. Posts which are welcomed are by definition not Spam
>> and never can be
>
> COLA Amnesia claims another victim. Note how Peter completely has
> forgotten about the numerous Linux users here who have said they have
> Roy's "news" posts filtered out.
>

And you seem to have totally forgotten about the majority of linux users
in COLA asking to Roy to keep on posting his stuff

And also urged him to clearly label his subjects that it can be easily
filtered by those who want to.

Now come on, TimmyBoy (I know you want to), please tell us the exact
number of spammers clearly labeling their stuff to be easily filtered out.

Might the number approach zero, or is it simply null?

Idiot
--
You're not my type. For that matter, you're not even my species

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:20:47 +0100, Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann.RemoveThis@t-online.de> wrote:
>Tim Smith wrote:

>> In article <hd1455$psv$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann.RemoveThis@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> Timmy boy seems to also ignore that Roys posts are *welcomed* in COLA
>>> by the linux users. Posts which are welcomed are by definition not Spam
>>> and never can be
>>
>> COLA Amnesia claims another victim. Note how Peter completely has
>> forgotten about the numerous Linux users here who have said they have
>> Roy's "news" posts filtered out.
>>

>And you seem to have totally forgotten about the majority of linux users
>in COLA asking to Roy to keep on posting his stuff

He hasn't forgotten. He's just another liar for microsoft.

On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:20:47 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <hd1455$psv$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann RemoveThis @t-online.de> wrote:
>>> Timmy boy seems to also ignore that Roys posts are *welcomed* in COLA
>>> by the linux users. Posts which are welcomed are by definition not
>>> Spam and never can be
>>
>> COLA Amnesia claims another victim. Note how Peter completely has
>> forgotten about the numerous Linux users here who have said they have
>> Roy's "news" posts filtered out.
>>
>>
> And you seem to have totally forgotten about the majority of linux users
> in COLA asking to Roy to keep on posting his stuff
>
> And also urged him to clearly label his subjects that it can be easily
> filtered by those who want to.
>
> Now come on, TimmyBoy (I know you want to), please tell us the exact
> number of spammers clearly labeling their stuff to be easily filtered
> out.
>
> Might the number approach zero, or is it simply null?
>
> Idiot

Poor old timmy-troll isn't getting anywhere on COLA these days, you guys
are seriously kicking his arse!!!!

--
C.O.L.A Charter:-
"For discussion of the benefits of GNU/Linux compared to other
operating systems."

Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Peter Köhlmann was heard to
say:

> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <hd1455$psv$02$1@news.t-online.com>,
>> Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann.RemoveThis@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> Timmy boy seems to also ignore that Roys posts are *welcomed* in COLA
>>> by the linux users. Posts which are welcomed are by definition not Spam
>>> and never can be
>>
>> COLA Amnesia claims another victim. Note how Peter completely has
>> forgotten about the numerous Linux users here who have said they have
>> Roy's "news" posts filtered out.
>>
>
> And you seem to have totally forgotten about the majority of linux users
> in COLA asking to Roy to keep on posting his stuff

..Perhaps the Smith troll can tell us just *who* these numerous Linux users
are, who say they are filtering out Roy's News posts.
Note he said "numerous", so I expect over a dozen or more names.

> And also urged him to clearly label his subjects that it can be easily
> filtered by those who want to.
>
> Now come on, TimmyBoy (I know you want to), please tell us the exact
> number of spammers clearly labeling their stuff to be easily filtered out.

And not forgetting teh nymshifting wintrolls & their drivel!

> Might the number approach zero, or is it simply null?
>
> Idiot

--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!

Timmy wrote:

> Maybe you should figure out what "bulk" and "indiscriminately" mean
> before commenting further, if you don't want to dig a deeper hole for
> yourself.

Same to you, Timmy. No ones posts in here fit those descriptions.
"Many" != "bulk", and "indiscriminate" isn't even close to being true,
for anyone posting in here.