Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

[RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Kernel RSS
Next:  Accepted libvirt 0.7.2-2 (source all i386)  
Author Message
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: [RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking
Archived from groups: linux>kernel (more info?)

From: Christoph Lameter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking

Scaling of MM locking has been a concern for a long time. With the arrival of
high thread counts in average business systems we may finally have to do
something about that.

This patch provides a series of accessors for mm locking so that the details
of mm locking (which is done today via mmap_sem) are hidden. This allows us
to try various implemenations of mm locking to solve the scaling issues.

Note that this patch is currently incomplete and just does enough to get my
kernels compiled on two platforms. If we agree on the naming etc
then I will complete this patch and do the accessor conversion for all of
the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org>

---
arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 14 ++++-----
arch/x86/mm/gup.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/vdso/vma.c | 4 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 14 ++++-----
drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c | 10 +++---
fs/aio.c | 10 +++---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 24 +++++++--------
fs/exec.c | 24 +++++++--------
fs/nfs/direct.c | 8 ++---
fs/proc/array.c | 4 +-
fs/proc/base.c | 4 +-
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 14 ++++-----
include/linux/mm_types.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
ipc/shm.c | 8 ++---
kernel/exit.c | 8 ++---
kernel/fork.c | 10 +++---
kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 4 +-
mm/fremap.c | 12 +++----
mm/init-mm.c | 2 -
mm/madvise.c | 12 +++----
mm/memory.c | 8 ++---
mm/mempolicy.c | 28 +++++++++---------
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++---
mm/mincore.c | 4 +-
mm/mlock.c | 26 ++++++++---------
mm/mmap.c | 20 ++++++-------
mm/mmu_notifier.c | 4 +-
mm/mprotect.c | 4 +-
mm/mremap.c | 4 +-
mm/msync.c | 8 ++---
mm/rmap.c | 12 +++----
mm/swapfile.c | 6 +--
mm/util.c | 4 +-
36 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne
* Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
* Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
*/
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);

__bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, si_code);
}
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ out_of_memory(struct pt_regs *regs, unsi
* We ran out of memory, call the OOM killer, and return the userspace
* (which will retry the fault, or kill us if we got oom-killed):
*/
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);

pagefault_out_of_memory();
}
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned
struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
int code = BUS_ADRERR;

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);

/* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die: */
if (!(error_code & PF_USER))
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsi
*/
if (kmemcheck_active(regs))
kmemcheck_hide(regs);
- prefetchw(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_lock_prefetch(mm);

if (unlikely(kmmio_fault(regs, address)))
return;
@@ -1055,13 +1055,13 @@ do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsi
* validate the source. If this is invalid we can skip the address
* space check, thus avoiding the deadlock:
*/
- if (unlikely(!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem))) {
+ if (unlikely(!mm_reader_trylock(mm))) {
if ((error_code & PF_USER) == 0 &&
!search_exception_tables(regs->ip)) {
bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address);
return;
}
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
} else {
/*
* The above down_read_trylock() might have succeeded in
@@ -1135,5 +1135,5 @@ good_area:

check_v8086_mode(regs, address, tsk);

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 13:03:11.000000000 -0600
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
atomic_t mm_users; /* How many users with user space? */
atomic_t mm_count; /* How many references to "struct mm_struct" (users count as 1) */
int map_count; /* number of VMAs */
- struct rw_semaphore mmap_sem;
+ struct rw_semaphore sem;
spinlock_t page_table_lock; /* Protects page tables and some counters */

struct list_head mmlist; /* List of maybe swapped mm's. These are globally strung
@@ -285,6 +285,66 @@ struct mm_struct {
#endif
};

+static inline void mm_reader_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ down_read(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_reader_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ up_read(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline int mm_reader_trylock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return down_read_trylock(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_writer_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ down_write(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_writer_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ up_write(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline int mm_writer_trylock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return down_write_trylock(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline int mm_locked(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return rwsem_is_locked(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_writer_to_reader_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ downgrade_write(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_writer_lock_nested(struct mm_struct *mm, int x)
+{
+ down_write_nested(&mm->sem, x);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_lock_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ init_rwsem(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_lock_prefetch(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ prefetchw(&mm->sem);
+}
+
+static inline void mm_nest_lock(spinlock_t *s, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ spin_lock_nest_lock(s, &mm->sem);
+}
+
/* Future-safe accessor for struct mm_struct's cpu_vm_mask. */
#define mm_cpumask(mm) (&(mm)->cpu_vm_mask)

Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -3252,7 +3252,7 @@ int access_process_vm(struct task_struct
if (!mm)
return 0;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
/* ignore errors, just check how much was successfully transferred */
while (len) {
int bytes, ret, offset;
@@ -3299,7 +3299,7 @@ int access_process_vm(struct task_struct
buf += bytes;
addr += bytes;
}
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);

return buf - old_buf;
@@ -3320,7 +3320,7 @@ void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsign
if (preempt_count())
return;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, ip);
if (vma && vma->vm_file) {
struct file *f = vma->vm_file;
@@ -3340,7 +3340,7 @@ void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsign
free_page((unsigned long)buf);
}
}
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
Index: linux-2.6/mm/migrate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/migrate.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/migrate.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static int do_move_page_to_node_array(st
struct page_to_node *pp;
LIST_HEAD(pagelist);

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);

/*
* Build a list of pages to migrate
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ set_status:
err = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_page_node,
(unsigned long)pm);

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
return err;
}

@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static void do_pages_stat_array(struct m
{
unsigned long i;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);

for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)(*pages);
@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ set_status:
status++;
}

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
}

/*
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mmap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mmap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(brk, unsigned long, brk)
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
unsigned long min_brk;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK
min_brk = mm->end_code;
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ set_brk:
mm->brk = brk;
out:
retval = mm->brk;
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return retval;
}

@@ -1969,18 +1969,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munmap, unsigned long, a

profile_munmap(addr);

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
ret = do_munmap(mm, addr, len);
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return ret;
}

static inline void verify_mm_writelocked(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
- if (unlikely(down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem))) {
+ if (unlikely(mm_reader_trylock(mm))) {
WARN_ON(1);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
}
#endif
}
@@ -2337,7 +2337,7 @@ static void vm_lock_anon_vma(struct mm_s
* The LSB of head.next can't change from under us
* because we hold the mm_all_locks_mutex.
*/
- spin_lock_nest_lock(&anon_vma->lock, &mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_nest_lock(&anon_vma->lock, mm);
/*
* We can safely modify head.next after taking the
* anon_vma->lock. If some other vma in this mm shares
@@ -2367,7 +2367,7 @@ static void vm_lock_mapping(struct mm_st
*/
if (test_and_set_bit(AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS, &mapping->flags))
BUG();
- spin_lock_nest_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock, &mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_nest_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock, mm);
}
}

@@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ int mm_take_all_locks(struct mm_struct *
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
int ret = -EINTR;

- BUG_ON(down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem));
+ BUG_ON(mm_reader_trylock(mm));

mutex_lock(&mm_all_locks_mutex);

@@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ void mm_drop_all_locks(struct mm_struct
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;

- BUG_ON(down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem));
+ BUG_ON(mm_reader_trylock(mm));
BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&mm_all_locks_mutex));

for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mmu_notifier.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mmu_notifier.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mmu_notifier.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(stru
goto out;

if (take_mmap_sem)
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
ret = mm_take_all_locks(mm);
if (unlikely(ret))
goto out_cleanup;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(stru
mm_drop_all_locks(mm);
out_cleanup:
if (take_mmap_sem)
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
/* kfree() does nothing if mmu_notifier_mm is NULL */
kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
out:
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mprotect.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mprotect.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mprotect.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long,

vm_flags = calc_vm_prot_bits(prot);

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);

vma = find_vma_prev(current->mm, start, &prev);
error = -ENOMEM;
@@ -315,6 +315,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mprotect, unsigned long,
}
}
out:
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return error;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mremap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mremap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mremap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -440,8 +440,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, a
{
unsigned long ret;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
ret = do_mremap(addr, old_len, new_len, flags, new_addr);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return ret;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/msync.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/msync.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/msync.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(msync, unsigned long, st
* If the interval [start,end) covers some unmapped address ranges,
* just ignore them, but return -ENOMEM at the end.
*/
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, start);
for (;Wink {
struct file *file;
@@ -81,12 +81,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(msync, unsigned long, st
if ((flags & MS_SYNC) && file &&
(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
get_file(file);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
error = vfs_fsync(file, file->f_path.dentry, 0);
fput(file);
if (error || start >= end)
goto out;
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, start);
} else {
if (start >= end) {
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(msync, unsigned long, st
}
}
out_unlock:
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
out:
return error ? : unmapped_error;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa
/* Pretend the page is referenced if the task has the
swap token and is in the middle of a page fault. */
if (mm != current->mm && has_swap_token(mm) &&
- rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem))
+ mm_locked(mm))
referenced++;

out_unmap:
@@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static int try_to_unmap_cluster(unsigned
* if we can acquire the mmap_sem for read, and vma is VM_LOCKED,
* keep the sem while scanning the cluster for mlocking pages.
*/
- if (MLOCK_PAGES && down_read_trylock(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem)) {
+ if (MLOCK_PAGES && mm_reader_trylock(vma->vm_mm)) {
locked_vma = (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED);
if (!locked_vma)
- up_read(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem); /* don't need it */
+ mm_reader_lock(vma->vm_mm); /* don't need it */
}

pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_cluster(unsigned
}
pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
if (locked_vma)
- up_read(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(vma->vm_mm);
return ret;
}

@@ -983,12 +983,12 @@ static int try_to_mlock_page(struct page
{
int mlocked = 0;

- if (down_read_trylock(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem)) {
+ if (mm_reader_trylock(vma->vm_mm)) {
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
mlock_vma_page(page);
mlocked++; /* really mlocked the page */
}
- up_read(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(vma->vm_mm);
}
return mlocked;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -961,21 +961,21 @@ static int unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
int ret = 0;

- if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
+ if (!mm_reader_trylock(mm)) {
/*
* Activate page so shrink_inactive_list is unlikely to unmap
* its ptes while lock is dropped, so swapoff can make progress.
*/
activate_page(page);
unlock_page(page);
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
lock_page(page);
}
for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
if (vma->anon_vma && (ret = unuse_vma(vma, entry, page)))
break;
}
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
return (ret < 0)? ret: 0;
}

Index: linux-2.6/mm/util.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/util.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/util.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -259,10 +259,10 @@ int __attribute__((weak)) get_user_pages
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
int ret;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
ret = get_user_pages(current, mm, start, nr_pages,
write, 0, pages, NULL);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);

return ret;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/fremap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/fremap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/fremap.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(remap_file_pages, unsign
#endif

/* We need down_write() to change vma->vm_flags. */
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
retry:
vma = find_vma(mm, start);

@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(remap_file_pages, unsign
}

if (!has_write_lock) {
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
has_write_lock = 1;
goto retry;
}
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(remap_file_pages, unsign
mlock_vma_pages_range(vma, start, start + size);
} else {
if (unlikely(has_write_lock)) {
- downgrade_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_to_reader_lock(mm);
has_write_lock = 0;
}
make_pages_present(start, start+size);
@@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(remap_file_pages, unsign

out:
if (likely(!has_write_lock))
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
else
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);

return err;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/init-mm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/init-mm.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/init-mm.c 2009-11-05 13:02:54.000000000 -0600
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct mm_struct init_mm = {
.pgd = swapper_pg_dir,
.mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
.mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
- .mmap_sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(init_mm.mmap_sem),
+ .sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(init_mm.sem),
.page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock),
.mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist),
.cpu_vm_mask = CPU_MASK_ALL,
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, unsigned long, add
if (!file)
goto out;
}
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
error = do_mmap_pgoff(file, addr, len, prot, flags, off >> PAGE_SHIFT);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);

if (file)
fput(file);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/gup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/gup.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/gup.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -357,10 +357,10 @@ slow_irqon:
start += nr << PAGE_SHIFT;
pages += nr;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
ret = get_user_pages(current, mm, start,
(end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT, write, 0, pages, NULL);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);

/* Have to be a bit careful with return values */
if (nr > 0) {
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/vdso/vma.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/vdso/vma.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/vdso/vma.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct l
if (!vdso_enabled)
return 0;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
addr = vdso_addr(mm->start_stack, vdso_size);
addr = get_unmapped_area(NULL, addr, vdso_size, 0, 0);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) {
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct l
}

up_fail:
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return ret;
}

Index: linux-2.6/fs/exec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/exec.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/exec.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int __bprm_mm_init(struct linux_b
if (!vma)
return -ENOMEM;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
vma->vm_mm = mm;

/*
@@ -252,11 +252,11 @@ static int __bprm_mm_init(struct linux_b
goto err;

mm->stack_vm = mm->total_vm = 1;
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
bprm->p = vma->vm_end - sizeof(void *);
return 0;
err:
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
bprm->vma = NULL;
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, vma);
return err;
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm
bprm->loader -= stack_shift;
bprm->exec -= stack_shift;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
vm_flags = VM_STACK_FLAGS;

/*
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm
if (stack_shift) {
ret = shift_arg_pages(vma, stack_shift);
if (ret) {
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
return ret;
}
}
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm
ret = -EFAULT;

out_unlock:
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(setup_arg_pages);
@@ -714,9 +714,9 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *m
* through with the exec. We must hold mmap_sem around
* checking core_state and changing tsk->mm.
*/
- down_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(old_mm);
if (unlikely(old_mm->core_state)) {
- up_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(old_mm);
return -EINTR;
}
}
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *m
task_unlock(tsk);
arch_pick_mmap_layout(mm);
if (old_mm) {
- up_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(old_mm);
BUG_ON(active_mm != old_mm);
mm_update_next_owner(old_mm);
mmput(old_mm);
@@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ static int coredump_wait(int exit_code,
core_state->dumper.task = tsk;
core_state->dumper.next = NULL;
core_waiters = zap_threads(tsk, mm, core_state, exit_code);
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);

if (unlikely(core_waiters < 0))
goto fail;
@@ -1782,12 +1782,12 @@ void do_coredump(long signr, int exit_co
goto fail;
}

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
/*
* If another thread got here first, or we are not dumpable, bail out.
*/
if (mm->core_state || !get_dumpable(mm)) {
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
put_cred(cred);
goto fail;
}
Index: linux-2.6/ipc/shm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/ipc/shm.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/ipc/shm.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ long do_shmat(int shmid, char __user *sh
sfd->file = shp->shm_file;
sfd->vm_ops = NULL;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
if (addr && !(shmflg & SHM_REMAP)) {
err = -EINVAL;
if (find_vma_intersection(current->mm, addr, addr + size))
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ long do_shmat(int shmid, char __user *sh
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(user_addr))
err = (long)user_addr;
invalid:
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);

fput(file);

@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(shmdt, char __user *, sh
if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
return retval;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

/*
* This function tries to be smart and unmap shm segments that
@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(shmdt, char __user *, sh

#endif

- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return retval;
}

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/exit.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/exit.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -655,11 +655,11 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *
* will increment ->nr_threads for each thread in the
* group with ->mm != NULL.
*/
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
core_state = mm->core_state;
if (core_state) {
struct core_thread self;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);

self.task = tsk;
self.next = xchg(&core_state->dumper.next, &self);
@@ -677,14 +677,14 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *
schedule();
}
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
}
atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
BUG_ON(mm != tsk->active_mm);
/* more a memory barrier than a real lock */
task_lock(tsk);
tsk->mm = NULL;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
enter_lazy_tlb(mm, current);
/* We don't want this task to be frozen prematurely */
clear_freeze_flag(tsk);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/fork.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/fork.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -283,12 +283,12 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm
unsigned long charge;
struct mempolicy *pol;

- down_write(&oldmm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(oldmm);
flush_cache_dup_mm(oldmm);
/*
* Not linked in yet - no deadlock potential:
*/
- down_write_nested(&mm->mmap_sem, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ mm_writer_lock_nested(mm, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);

mm->locked_vm = 0;
mm->mmap = NULL;
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm
arch_dup_mmap(oldmm, mm);
retval = 0;
out:
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
flush_tlb_mm(oldmm);
- up_write(&oldmm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(oldmm);
return retval;
fail_nomem_policy:
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, tmp);
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static struct mm_struct * mm_init(struct
{
atomic_set(&mm->mm_users, 1);
atomic_set(&mm->mm_count, 1);
- init_rwsem(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_lock_init(mm);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mm->mmlist);
mm->flags = (current->mm) ?
(current->mm->flags & MMF_INIT_MASK) : default_dump_filter;
Index: linux-2.6/mm/madvise.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/madvise.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/madvise.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ static long madvise_remove(struct vm_are
+ ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT);

/* vmtruncate_range needs to take i_mutex and i_alloc_sem */
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);
error = vmtruncate_range(mapping->host, offset, endoff);
- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);
return error;
}

@@ -343,9 +343,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise, unsigned long,

write = madvise_need_mmap_write(behavior);
if (write)
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
else
- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);

if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
goto out;
@@ -408,9 +408,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise, unsigned long,
}
out:
if (write)
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
else
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);

return error;
}
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mempolicy.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mempolicy.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
mpol_rebind_policy(vma->vm_policy, new);
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
}

static const struct mempolicy_operations mpol_ops[MPOL_MAX] = {
@@ -642,13 +642,13 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned sh
* with no 'mm'.
*/
if (mm)
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
task_lock(current);
ret = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nodes, scratch);
if (ret) {
task_unlock(current);
if (mm)
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
mpol_put(new);
goto out;
}
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned sh
current->il_next = first_node(new->v.nodes);
task_unlock(current);
if (mm)
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);

mpol_put(old);
ret = 0;
@@ -738,10 +738,10 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy
* vma/shared policy at addr is NULL. We
* want to return MPOL_DEFAULT in this case.
*/
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma_intersection(mm, addr, addr+1);
if (!vma) {
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
return -EFAULT;
}
if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->get_policy)
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy
}

if (vma) {
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);
vma = NULL;
}

@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy
out:
mpol_cond_put(pol);
if (vma)
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);
return err;
}

@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ int do_migrate_pages(struct mm_struct *m
if (err)
return err;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);

err = migrate_vmas(mm, from_nodes, to_nodes, flags);
if (err)
@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ int do_migrate_pages(struct mm_struct *m
break;
}
out:
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
if (err < 0)
return err;
return busy;
@@ -1029,12 +1029,12 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start
{
NODEMASK_SCRATCH(scratch);
if (scratch) {
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
task_lock(current);
err = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nmask, scratch);
task_unlock(current);
if (err)
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
} else
err = -ENOMEM;
NODEMASK_SCRATCH_FREE(scratch);
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start
} else
putback_lru_pages(&pagelist);

- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
mpol_out:
mpol_put(new);
return err;
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mincore.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mincore.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mincore.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -209,9 +209,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mincore, unsigned long,
* Do at most PAGE_SIZE entries per iteration, due to
* the temporary buffer size.
*/
- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);
retval = do_mincore(start, tmp, min(pages, PAGE_SIZE));
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);

if (retval <= 0)
break;
Index: linux-2.6/mm/mlock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/mlock.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/mlock.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static long __mlock_vma_pages_range(stru
VM_BUG_ON(end & ~PAGE_MASK);
VM_BUG_ON(start < vma->vm_start);
VM_BUG_ON(end > vma->vm_end);
- VM_BUG_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem));
+ VM_BUG_ON(!mm_locked(mm));

gup_flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_GET;
if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, st

lru_add_drain_all(); /* flush pagevec */

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
len = PAGE_ALIGN(len + (start & ~PAGE_MASK));
start &= PAGE_MASK;

@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(mlock, unsigned long, st
/* check against resource limits */
if ((locked <= lock_limit) || capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
error = do_mlock(start, len, 1);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return error;
}

@@ -504,11 +504,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(munlock, unsigned long,
{
int ret;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
len = PAGE_ALIGN(len + (start & ~PAGE_MASK));
start &= PAGE_MASK;
ret = do_mlock(start, len, 0);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return ret;
}

@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)

lru_add_drain_all(); /* flush pagevec */

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);

lock_limit = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur;
lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
if (!(flags & MCL_CURRENT) || (current->mm->total_vm <= lock_limit) ||
capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
ret = do_mlockall(flags);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -569,9 +569,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(munlockall)
{
int ret;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
ret = do_mlockall(0);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return ret;
}

@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ int account_locked_memory(struct mm_stru

pgsz = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

lim = rlim[RLIMIT_AS].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
vm = mm->total_vm + pgsz;
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int account_locked_memory(struct mm_stru

error = 0;
out:
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
return error;
}

@@ -644,10 +644,10 @@ void refund_locked_memory(struct mm_stru
{
unsigned long pgsz = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

mm->total_vm -= pgsz;
mm->locked_vm -= pgsz;

- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct ib_umem *ib_umem_get(struct ib_uc

npages = PAGE_ALIGN(size + umem->offset) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);

locked = npages + current->mm->locked_vm;
lock_limit = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ out:
} else
current->mm->locked_vm = locked;

- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
if (vma_list)
free_page((unsigned long) vma_list);
free_page((unsigned long) page_list);
@@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ static void ib_umem_account(struct work_
{
struct ib_umem *umem = container_of(work, struct ib_umem, work);

- down_write(&umem->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(umem->mm);
umem->mm->locked_vm -= umem->diff;
- up_write(&umem->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(umem->mm);
mmput(umem->mm);
kfree(umem);
}
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ void ib_umem_release(struct ib_umem *ume
* we defer the vm_locked accounting to the system workqueue.
*/
if (context->closing) {
- if (!down_write_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
+ if (!mm_writer_trylock(mm)) {
INIT_WORK(&umem->work, ib_umem_account);
umem->mm = mm;
umem->diff = diff;
@@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ void ib_umem_release(struct ib_umem *ume
return;
}
} else
- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

current->mm->locked_vm -= diff;
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);
kfree(umem);
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ munmap_notify(struct notifier_block *sel
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct vm_area_struct *mpnt;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);

mpnt = find_vma(mm, addr);
if (mpnt && mpnt->vm_file && (mpnt->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)) {
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
/* To avoid latency problems, we only process the current CPU,
* hoping that most samples for the task are on this CPU
*/
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ munmap_notify(struct notifier_block *sel
return 0;
}

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
return 0;
}

@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void release_mm(struct mm_struct
{
if (!mm)
return;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);
}

@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *take_tasks_mm(s
{
struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
if (mm)
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
return mm;
}

Index: linux-2.6/fs/aio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/aio.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/aio.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ static void aio_free_ring(struct kioctx
put_page(info->ring_pages[i]);

if (info->mmap_size) {
- down_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(ctx->mm);
do_munmap(ctx->mm, info->mmap_base, info->mmap_size);
- up_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(ctx->mm);
}

if (info->ring_pages && info->ring_pages != info->internal_pages)
@@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ static int aio_setup_ring(struct kioctx

info->mmap_size = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
dprintk("attempting mmap of %lu bytes\n", info->mmap_size);
- down_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(ctx->mm);
info->mmap_base = do_mmap(NULL, 0, info->mmap_size,
PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE,
0);
if (IS_ERR((void *)info->mmap_base)) {
- up_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(ctx->mm);
info->mmap_size = 0;
aio_free_ring(ctx);
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int aio_setup_ring(struct kioctx
info->nr_pages = get_user_pages(current, ctx->mm,
info->mmap_base, nr_pages,
1, 0, info->ring_pages, NULL);
- up_write(&ctx->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(ctx->mm);

if (unlikely(info->nr_pages != nr_pages)) {
aio_free_ring(ctx);
Index: linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/binfmt_elf.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static int set_brk(unsigned long start,
end = ELF_PAGEALIGN(end);
if (end > start) {
unsigned long addr;
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
addr = do_brk(start, end - start);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
if (BAD_ADDR(addr))
return addr;
}
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static unsigned long elf_map(struct file
if (!size)
return addr;

- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
/*
* total_size is the size of the ELF (interpreter) image.
* The _first_ mmap needs to know the full size, otherwise
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static unsigned long elf_map(struct file
} else
map_addr = do_mmap(filep, addr, size, prot, type, off);

- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
return(map_addr);
}

@@ -517,9 +517,9 @@ static unsigned long load_elf_interp(str
elf_bss = ELF_PAGESTART(elf_bss + ELF_MIN_ALIGN - 1);

/* Map the last of the bss segment */
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
error = do_brk(elf_bss, last_bss - elf_bss);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
if (BAD_ADDR(error))
goto out_close;
}
@@ -978,10 +978,10 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_
and some applications "depend" upon this behavior.
Since we do not have the power to recompile these, we
emulate the SVr4 behavior. Sigh. */
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
error = do_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_EXEC,
MAP_FIXED | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
}

#ifdef ELF_PLAT_INIT
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int load_elf_library(struct file
eppnt++;

/* Now use mmap to map the library into memory. */
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
error = do_mmap(file,
ELF_PAGESTART(eppnt->p_vaddr),
(eppnt->p_filesz +
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ static int load_elf_library(struct file
MAP_FIXED | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_DENYWRITE,
(eppnt->p_offset -
ELF_PAGEOFFSET(eppnt->p_vaddr)));
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
if (error != ELF_PAGESTART(eppnt->p_vaddr))
goto out_free_ph;

@@ -1089,9 +1089,9 @@ static int load_elf_library(struct file
ELF_MIN_ALIGN - 1);
bss = eppnt->p_memsz + eppnt->p_vaddr;
if (bss > len) {
- down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(current->mm);
do_brk(len, bss - len);
- up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(current->mm);
}
error = 0;

Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfs/direct.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfs/direct.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/nfs/direct.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -309,10 +309,10 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_read_schedule_
if (unlikely(!data))
break;

- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);
result = get_user_pages(current, current->mm, user_addr,
data->npages, 1, 0, data->pagevec, NULL);
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);
if (result < 0) {
nfs_readdata_free(data);
break;
@@ -730,10 +730,10 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_write_schedule
if (unlikely(!data))
break;

- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);
result = get_user_pages(current, current->mm, user_addr,
data->npages, 0, 0, data->pagevec, NULL);
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);
if (result < 0) {
nfs_writedata_free(data);
break;
Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/array.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -394,13 +394,13 @@ static inline void task_show_stack_usage
struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);

if (mm) {
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, task->stack_start);
if (vma)
seq_printf(m, "Stack usage:\t%lu kB\n",
get_stack_usage_in_bytes(vma, task) >> 10);

- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);
}
}
Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/base.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/base.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/base.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -1301,11 +1301,11 @@ struct file *get_mm_exe_file(struct mm_s

/* We need mmap_sem to protect against races with removal of
* VM_EXECUTABLE vmas */
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
exe_file = mm->exe_file;
if (exe_file)
get_file(exe_file);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
return exe_file;
}

Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void vma_stop(struct proc_maps_pr
{
if (vma && vma != priv->tail_vma) {
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);
}
}
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m,
mm = mm_for_maps(priv->task);
if (!mm)
return NULL;
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);

tail_vma = get_gate_vma(priv->task);
priv->tail_vma = tail_vma;
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ out:

/* End of vmas has been reached */
m->version = (tail_vma != NULL)? 0: -1UL;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
mmput(mm);
return tail_vma;
}
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct f
.pmd_entry = clear_refs_pte_range,
.mm = mm,
};
- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
clear_refs_walk.private = vma;
if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct f
&clear_refs_walk);
}
flush_tlb_mm(mm);
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
mmput(mm);
}
put_task_struct(task);
@@ -733,10 +733,10 @@ static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file
if (!pages)
goto out_mm;

- down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(current->mm);
ret = get_user_pages(current, current->mm, uaddr, pagecount,
1, 0, pages, NULL);
- up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(current->mm);

if (ret < 0)
goto out_free;
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_output.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_output.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ int seq_print_user_ip(struct trace_seq *
if (mm) {
const struct vm_area_struct *vma;

- down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_lock(mm);
vma = find_vma(mm, ip);
if (vma) {
file = vma->vm_file;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ int seq_print_user_ip(struct trace_seq *
ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "[+0x%lx]",
ip - vmstart);
}
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_reader_unlock(mm);
}
if (ret && ((sym_flags & TRACE_ITER_SYM_ADDR) || !file))
ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " <" IP_FMT ">", ip);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c 2009-11-05 13:02:34.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/sys_i386_32.c 2009-11-05 13:02:48.000000000 -0600
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mmap2(unsigned long
goto out;
}

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);
error = do_mmap_pgoff(file, addr, len, prot, flags, pgoff);
- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);

if (file)
fput(file);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c 2009-11-05 13:02:34.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c 2009-11-05 13:02:48.000000000 -0600
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct l
if (vdso_enabled == VDSO_DISABLED)
return 0;

- down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_lock(mm);

/* Test compat mode once here, in case someone
changes it via sysctl */
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct l
if (ret)
current->mm->context.vdso = NULL;

- up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+ mm_writer_unlock(mm);

return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.TakeThisOut@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Andi Kleen

External


Since: Feb 12, 2007
Posts: 666



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Christoph Lameter <cl DeleteThis @linux-foundation.org> writes:

> Instead of a rw semaphore use a mutex and a per cpu counter for the number
> of the current readers. read locking then becomes very cheap requiring only
> the increment of a per cpu counter.
>
> Write locking is more expensive since the writer must scan the percpu array
> and wait until all readers are complete. Since the readers are not holding
> semaphores we have no wait queue from which the writer could wakeup. In this
> draft we simply wait for one millisecond between scans of the percpu
> array. A different solution must be found there.

I'm not sure making all writers more expensive is really a good idea.

For example it will definitely impact the AIM7 multi brk() issue
or the mysql allocation case, which are all writer intensive. I assume
doing a lot of mmaps/brks in parallel is not that uncommon.

My thinking was more that we simply need per VMA locking or
some other per larger address range locking. Unfortunately that
needs changes in a lot of users that mess with the VMA lists
(perhaps really needs some better abstractions for VMA list management
first)

That said also addressing the convoying issues in the current
semaphores would be a good idea, which is what your patch does.

-Andi

--
ak DeleteThis @linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Andi Kleen

External


Since: Feb 12, 2007
Posts: 666



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: [RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Christoph Lameter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> From: Christoph Lameter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: [RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking
>
> Scaling of MM locking has been a concern for a long time. With the arrival of
> high thread counts in average business systems we may finally have to do
> something about that.

Thanks for starting to think about that. Yes, this is definitely
something that needs to be addressed.

> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2009-11-05 13:02:35.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/fault.c 2009-11-05 13:02:41.000000000 -0600
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne
> * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
> * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
> */
> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + mm_reader_unlock(mm);

My assumption was that a suitable scalable lock (or rather multi locks)
would need to know about the virtual address, or at least the VMA.
As in doing range locking for different address space areas.

So this simple abstraction doesn't seem to be enough to really experiment?

Or what did you have in mind for improving the locking without using
ranges?

-Andi

--
ak.TakeThisOut@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.TakeThisOut@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: [RFC MM] Accessors for mm locking [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:

> My assumption was that a suitable scalable lock (or rather multi locks)
> would need to know about the virtual address, or at least the VMA.
> As in doing range locking for different address space areas.

Not sure why the address would matter. The main problem right now is that
there are cachelines in mm_struct that are bouncing for concurrent page faults
etc. Ranges wont help if you need to serialize access to mm_struct.

> So this simple abstraction doesn't seem to be enough to really experiment?

Look at the next patch which gives a rough implementation of using per cpu
counters for read locking instead of the rw semaphore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I'm not sure making all writers more expensive is really a good idea.

The scaling problems that I have seen (like simple concurrent page faults)
are due to lock contention on mmap_sem and due to counter updates in
mm_struct.

> For example it will definitely impact the AIM7 multi brk() issue
> or the mysql allocation case, which are all writer intensive. I assume
> doing a lot of mmaps/brks in parallel is not that uncommon.

No its not that common. Page faults are much more common. The AIM7 seems
to be an artificial case? What does mysql do for allocation? If its brk()
related then simply going to larger increases may fix the issue??

> My thinking was more that we simply need per VMA locking or
> some other per larger address range locking. Unfortunately that
> needs changes in a lot of users that mess with the VMA lists
> (perhaps really needs some better abstractions for VMA list management
> first)

We have range locking through the distribution of the ptl for systems with
more than 4 processors. One can use that today to lock ranges of the
address space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo RemoveThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:20 pm
Post subject: [RFC MM] swap counters [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Kamezawa sans swap counters on top of it all. Now we need no additional
atomic ops in VM fast paths.

---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 14 +++++++++++---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 +
mm/memory.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
mm/rmap.c | 1 +
mm/swapfile.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 15:58:48.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 16:03:12.000000000 -0600
@@ -16,8 +16,9 @@

void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- unsigned long data, text, lib;
+ unsigned long data, text, lib, swap;
unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss;
+ int cpu;

/*
* Note: to minimize their overhead, mm maintains hiwater_vm and
@@ -36,6 +37,11 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
data = mm->total_vm - mm->shared_vm - mm->stack_vm;
text = (PAGE_ALIGN(mm->end_code) - (mm->start_code & PAGE_MASK)) >> 10;
lib = (mm->exec_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10)) - text;
+
+ swap = 0;
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ swap += per_cpu(mm->rss->swap, cpu);
+
seq_printf(m,
"VmPeak:\t%8lu kB\n"
"VmSize:\t%8lu kB\n"
@@ -46,7 +52,8 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
"VmStk:\t%8lu kB\n"
"VmExe:\t%8lu kB\n"
"VmLib:\t%8lu kB\n"
- "VmPTE:\t%8lu kB\n",
+ "VmPTE:\t%8lu kB\n"
+ "VmSwap:\t%8lu kB\n",
hiwater_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
(total_vm - mm->reserved_vm) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
mm->locked_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
@@ -54,7 +61,8 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
total_rss << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
data << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
mm->stack_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10), text, lib,
- (PTRS_PER_PTE*sizeof(pte_t)*mm->nr_ptes) >> 10);
+ (PTRS_PER_PTE*sizeof(pte_t)*mm->nr_ptes) >> 10,
+ swap << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
}

unsigned long task_vsize(struct mm_struct *mm)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 15:51:38.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 15:51:55.000000000 -0600
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct address_space;
struct mm_counter {
long file;
long anon;
+ long swap;
long readers;
};

Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 15:52:00.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 16:01:48.000000000 -0600
@@ -587,7 +587,9 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, s
&src_mm->mmlist);
spin_unlock(&mmlist_lock);
}
- if (is_write_migration_entry(entry) &&
+ if (!is_migration_entry(entry))
+ __this_cpu_inc(src_mm->rss->swap);
+ else if (is_write_migration_entry(entry) &&
is_cow_mapping(vm_flags)) {
/*
* COW mappings require pages in both parent
@@ -864,9 +866,15 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struc
if (pte_file(ptent)) {
if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)))
print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
- } else if
- (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(pte_to_swp_entry(ptent))))
- print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
+ } else {
+ swp_entry_t ent = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
+
+ if (!is_migration_entry(ent))
+ __this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->swap);
+
+ if (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(ent)))
+ print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
+ }
pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, (addr != end && *zap_work > 0));

@@ -2569,6 +2577,7 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
*/

__this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->anon);
+ __this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->swap);
pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
Index: linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 15:57:51.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 15:58:43.000000000 -0600
@@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page
spin_unlock(&mmlist_lock);
}
__this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->anon);
+ __this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->swap);
} else if (PAGE_MIGRATION) {
/*
* Store the pfn of the page in a special migration
Index: linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 15:57:15.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 15:57:36.000000000 -0600
@@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_stru
}

__this_cpu_inc(vma->vm_mm->rss->anon);
+ __this_cpu_dec(vma->vm_mm->rss->swap);
get_page(page);
set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)));

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.DeleteThis@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

External


Since: Nov 08, 2006
Posts: 421



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:20 pm
Post subject: Re: [RFC MM] swap counters [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:05:19 -0500 (EST)
Christoph Lameter <cl RemoveThis @linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Kamezawa sans swap counters on top of it all. Now we need no additional
> atomic ops in VM fast paths.
>
Thanks, I'll rewrite mine in this way.
(As Minchan pointed out, is_migration_entry() is not enough.)

I'll post rebased one in reply to this.

Regards,
-Kame


> ---
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 +
> mm/memory.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> mm/rmap.c | 1 +
> mm/swapfile.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 15:58:48.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2009-11-05 16:03:12.000000000 -0600
> @@ -16,8 +16,9 @@
>
> void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> - unsigned long data, text, lib;
> + unsigned long data, text, lib, swap;
> unsigned long hiwater_vm, total_vm, hiwater_rss, total_rss;
> + int cpu;
>
> /*
> * Note: to minimize their overhead, mm maintains hiwater_vm and
> @@ -36,6 +37,11 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
> data = mm->total_vm - mm->shared_vm - mm->stack_vm;
> text = (PAGE_ALIGN(mm->end_code) - (mm->start_code & PAGE_MASK)) >> 10;
> lib = (mm->exec_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10)) - text;
> +
> + swap = 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + swap += per_cpu(mm->rss->swap, cpu);
> +
> seq_printf(m,
> "VmPeak:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmSize:\t%8lu kB\n"
> @@ -46,7 +52,8 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
> "VmStk:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmExe:\t%8lu kB\n"
> "VmLib:\t%8lu kB\n"
> - "VmPTE:\t%8lu kB\n",
> + "VmPTE:\t%8lu kB\n"
> + "VmSwap:\t%8lu kB\n",
> hiwater_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> (total_vm - mm->reserved_vm) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> mm->locked_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> @@ -54,7 +61,8 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct
> total_rss << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> data << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> mm->stack_vm << (PAGE_SHIFT-10), text, lib,
> - (PTRS_PER_PTE*sizeof(pte_t)*mm->nr_ptes) >> 10);
> + (PTRS_PER_PTE*sizeof(pte_t)*mm->nr_ptes) >> 10,
> + swap << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
> }
>
> unsigned long task_vsize(struct mm_struct *mm)
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 15:51:38.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-05 15:51:55.000000000 -0600
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct address_space;
> struct mm_counter {
> long file;
> long anon;
> + long swap;
> long readers;
> };
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 15:52:00.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/memory.c 2009-11-05 16:01:48.000000000 -0600
> @@ -587,7 +587,9 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, s
> &src_mm->mmlist);
> spin_unlock(&mmlist_lock);
> }
> - if (is_write_migration_entry(entry) &&
> + if (!is_migration_entry(entry))
> + __this_cpu_inc(src_mm->rss->swap);
> + else if (is_write_migration_entry(entry) &&
> is_cow_mapping(vm_flags)) {
> /*
> * COW mappings require pages in both parent
> @@ -864,9 +866,15 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struc
> if (pte_file(ptent)) {
> if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)))
> print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
> - } else if
> - (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(pte_to_swp_entry(ptent))))
> - print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
> + } else {
> + swp_entry_t ent = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
> +
> + if (!is_migration_entry(ent))
> + __this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->swap);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(ent)))
> + print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
> + }
> pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
> } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, (addr != end && *zap_work > 0));
>
> @@ -2569,6 +2577,7 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
> */
>
> __this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->anon);
> + __this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->swap);
> pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
> pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 15:57:51.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c 2009-11-05 15:58:43.000000000 -0600
> @@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page
> spin_unlock(&mmlist_lock);
> }
> __this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->anon);
> + __this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->swap);
> } else if (PAGE_MIGRATION) {
> /*
> * Store the pfn of the page in a special migration
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 15:57:15.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/swapfile.c 2009-11-05 15:57:36.000000000 -0600
> @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_stru
> }
>
> __this_cpu_inc(vma->vm_mm->rss->anon);
> + __this_cpu_dec(vma->vm_mm->rss->swap);
> get_page(page);
> set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
> pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)));
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo RemoveThis @vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo RemoveThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Andi Kleen

External


Since: Feb 12, 2007
Posts: 666



(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:20 am
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:03:39PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > For example it will definitely impact the AIM7 multi brk() issue
> > or the mysql allocation case, which are all writer intensive. I assume
> > doing a lot of mmaps/brks in parallel is not that uncommon.
>
> No its not that common. Page faults are much more common. The AIM7 seems
> to be an artificial case? What does mysql do for allocation? If its brk()

AIM7 is artificial yes, but I suspect similar problems (to a less
extreme degree) are in other workloads.

> related then simply going to larger increases may fix the issue??

For mysql it's mmap through malloc(). There has been some tuning in
glibc for it. But I suspect it's a more general problem that will
still need kernel improvements.

>
> > My thinking was more that we simply need per VMA locking or
> > some other per larger address range locking. Unfortunately that
> > needs changes in a lot of users that mess with the VMA lists
> > (perhaps really needs some better abstractions for VMA list management
> > first)
>
> We have range locking through the distribution of the ptl for systems with
> more than 4 processors. One can use that today to lock ranges of the
> address space.

Yes but all the major calls still take mmap_sem, which is not ranged.

-Andi
--
ak RemoveThis @linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo RemoveThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Minchan Kim

External


Since: Mar 16, 2009
Posts: 46



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hi, Christoph.

How about change from 'mm_readers' to 'is_readers' to improve your
goal 'scalibility'?
===
static inline int is_readers(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
int cpu;
int ret = 0;

for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
if (per_cpu(mm->rss->readers, cpu)) {
ret = 1;
break;
}
}

return ret;
}
===


On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Christoph Lameter
<cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> From: Christoph Lamter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead
>
> Instead of a rw semaphore use a mutex and a per cpu counter for the number
> of the current readers. read locking then becomes very cheap requiring only
> the increment of a per cpu counter.
>
> Write locking is more expensive since the writer must scan the percpu array
> and wait until all readers are complete. Since the readers are not holding
> semaphores we have no wait queue from which the writer could wakeup. In this
> draft we simply wait for one millisecond between scans of the percpu
> array. A different solution must be found there.
>
> Patch is on top of -next and the percpu counter patches that I posted
> yesterday. The patch adds another per cpu counter to the file and anon rss
> counters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lamter <cl.TakeThisOut@linux-foundation.org>
>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |   68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  mm/init-mm.c             |    2 -
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h     2009-11-05 13:03:11.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h  2009-11-05 13:06:31.000000000 -0600
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/page-debug-flags.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  #include <asm/mmu.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
>
>  #ifndef AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
>  #define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH 0
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ struct address_space;
>  struct mm_counter {
>        long file;
>        long anon;
> +       long readers;
>  };
>
>  /*
> @@ -214,7 +216,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
>        atomic_t mm_users;                      /* How many users with user space? */
>        atomic_t mm_count;                      /* How many references to "struct mm_struct" (users count as 1) */
>        int map_count;                          /* number of VMAs */
> -       struct rw_semaphore sem;
> +       struct mutex lock;
>        spinlock_t page_table_lock;             /* Protects page tables and some counters */
>
>        struct list_head mmlist;                /* List of maybe swapped mm's.  These are globally strung
> @@ -285,64 +287,104 @@ struct mm_struct {
>  #endif
>  };
>
> +static inline int mm_readers(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +       int cpu;
> +       int readers = 0;
> +
> +       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +               readers += per_cpu(mm->rss->readers, cpu);
> +
> +       return readers;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void mm_reader_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       down_read(&mm->sem);
> +redo:
> +       this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->readers);
> +       if (mutex_is_locked(&mm->lock)) {
> +               this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->readers);
> +               /* Need to wait till mutex is released */
> +               mutex_lock(&mm->lock);
> +               mutex_unlock(&mm->lock);
> +               goto redo;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static inline void mm_reader_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       up_read(&mm->sem);
> +       this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->readers);
>  }
>
>  static inline int mm_reader_trylock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       return down_read_trylock(&mm->sem);
> +       this_cpu_inc(mm->rss->readers);
> +       if (mutex_is_locked(&mm->lock)) {
> +               this_cpu_dec(mm->rss->readers);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +       return 1;
>  }
>
>  static inline void mm_writer_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       down_write(&mm->sem);
> +redo:
> +       mutex_lock(&mm->lock);
> +       if (mm_readers(mm) == 0)

We can change this.

if (!is_readers(mm))
return;

> +               return;
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&mm->lock);
> +       msleep(1);
> +       goto redo;
>  }
>
>  static inline void mm_writer_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       up_write(&mm->sem);
> +       mutex_unlock(&mm->lock);
>  }
>
>  static inline int mm_writer_trylock(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -       return down_write_trylock(&mm->sem);
> +       if (!mutex_trylock(&mm->lock))
> +               goto fail;
> +
> +       if (mm_readers(mm) == 0)
> +               return 1;

if (!is_readers(mm))
return 1;

> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&mm->lock);
> +fail:
> +       return 0;
>  }
>

--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.TakeThisOut@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Yes but all the major calls still take mmap_sem, which is not ranged.

But exactly that issue is addressed by this patch!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.DeleteThis@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Minchan Kim wrote:

> How about change from 'mm_readers' to 'is_readers' to improve your
> goal 'scalibility'?

Good idea. Thanks. Next rev will use your suggestion.

Any creative thoughts on what to do about the 1 millisecond wait period?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.DeleteThis@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Andi Kleen

External


Since: Feb 12, 2007
Posts: 666



(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:08:54PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > Yes but all the major calls still take mmap_sem, which is not ranged.
>
> But exactly that issue is addressed by this patch!

Major calls = mmap, brk, etc.

Only for page faults, not for anything that takes it for write.

Anyways the better reader lock is a step in the right direction, but
I have my doubts it's a good idea to make write really slow here.

-Andi
--
ak DeleteThis @linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:08:54PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > Yes but all the major calls still take mmap_sem, which is not ranged.
> >
> > But exactly that issue is addressed by this patch!
>
> Major calls = mmap, brk, etc.

Those are rare. More frequently are for faults, get_user_pages and
the like operations that are frequent.

brk depends on process wide settings and has to be
serialized using a processor wide locks.

mmap and other address space local modification may be able to avoid
taking mmap write lock by taking the read lock and then locking the
ptls in the page struct relevant to the address space being modified.

This is also enabled by this patchset.

> Only for page faults, not for anything that takes it for write.
>
> Anyways the better reader lock is a step in the right direction, but
> I have my doubts it's a good idea to make write really slow here.

The bigger the system the larger the problems with mmap. This is one key
scaling issue important for the VM. We can work on that. I have a patch
here that restricts the per cpu checks to only those cpus on which the
process has at some times run before.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Christoph Lameter

External


Since: Nov 05, 2008
Posts: 104



(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:20 pm
Post subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: only scan cpus used by an mm [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

One way to reduce the cost of the writer lock is to track the cpus used
and loop over the processors in that bitmap.

---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 1 +
include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 ++-
kernel/fork.c | 2 ++
mm/init-mm.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h 2009-11-06 12:26:24.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h 2009-11-06 12:26:36.000000000 -0600
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_s
percpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm, next);
#endif
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &next->cpus_used);

/* Re-load page tables */
load_cr3(next->pgd);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-06 12:26:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h 2009-11-06 12:26:36.000000000 -0600
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
struct linux_binfmt *binfmt;

cpumask_t cpu_vm_mask;
+ cpumask_t cpus_used;

/* Architecture-specific MM context */
mm_context_t context;
@@ -291,7 +292,7 @@ static inline int mm_has_reader(struct m
{
int cpu;

- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &mm->cpus_used)
if (per_cpu(mm->rss->readers, cpu))
return 1;

Index: linux-2.6/mm/init-mm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/init-mm.c 2009-11-06 12:26:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/mm/init-mm.c 2009-11-06 12:26:36.000000000 -0600
@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ struct mm_struct init_mm = {
.page_table_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock),
.mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist),
.cpu_vm_mask = CPU_MASK_ALL,
+ .cpus_used = CPU_MASK_ALL,
.rss = &init_mm_counters,
};
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/fork.c 2009-11-06 12:26:35.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/fork.c 2009-11-06 12:26:40.000000000 -0600
@@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ static int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm
mm->cached_hole_size = ~0UL;
mm->map_count = 0;
cpumask_clear(mm_cpumask(mm));
+ cpumask_clear(&mm->cpus_used);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mm->cpus_used);
mm->mm_rb = RB_ROOT;
rb_link = &mm->mm_rb.rb_node;
rb_parent = NULL;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo.DeleteThis@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Andi Kleen

External


Since: Feb 12, 2007
Posts: 666



(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:20 pm
Post subject: Re: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: only scan cpus used by an mm [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 01:53:35PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> One way to reduce the cost of the writer lock is to track the cpus used
> and loop over the processors in that bitmap.

Can't you use the same mask as is used for TLB flushing?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors - I'm implementing an optional mecanism that some platforms can use on powerpc to hook the various MMIO and PIO operation...

vmlist_lock locking - My understanding is that get_vm_area_node etc. can't be called in interrupt context because vmlist_lock is obtained wit...

nfsroot and locking - Hi, I have a quick question about nfsroot in linux: Is there any way to use nfsv3 in the nfsroot (nolock is OK there),...

[locking api] It's ok? - Hello! In all kernel version on my system already see this locking api result: dmesg: Linux version 2.6.22-rc5-wifi0...

init_mm locking - Another things I stumbled on lately when toying with some mm rework on powerpc, is the lack of any locking when..

JFS possible recursive locking - Stumbled about those, but had not time to investigate (or fix) yet, just wanted to report them before they get lost #....
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Kernel All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]