Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

License packaging dudes / libnet-snmp openssl and GPL

 
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Legal RSS
Next:  RFS: l7-filter-userspace  
Author Message
Eduardo Ferro

External


Since: Apr 09, 2009
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:20 am
Post subject: License packaging dudes / libnet-snmp openssl and GPL
Archived from groups: linux>debian>legal (more info?)

Hi.

I have the following license related doubt:

There is a upstream code with GPL license, that link dynamically with
libsnmp (http://www.net-snmp.org/).
Libsnmp can be compiled with or without openssl support. The upstream
code don't use the parts of libsnmp that supports encryption and needs
openssl, so, in fact, the upstream code don't required openssl.

The debian package for libsnmp and libsnmp-dev depends on openssl, and
there is not a "libsnmp-withoutopenssl" package...
So when I try to package the upstream code I found that I have the
problem to link together GPL code with OpenSSL, with the problem of
the GPL/OpenSSL license incompatibility

I look for a similar problem and I found that some packages have at
their licenses a GPL exception related with open ssl code...

I ask/comment the upstream developer about the possibility of include
this "GPL exception"clause , and it answer:
"""I also agree to the GPL exception for OpenSSL. You can go ahead and
change the license for the ubuntu-included package."""
So, he was agree with this exception, but He thinks that it is a
debian/ubuntu package related stuff

My doubts are:
1) Can I package the code (without modification of the original copyright code)?
2) How can I explain this situation in the debian/copyright file?
3) I understand, that the problem is related to the debian package,
not the upstream code (it don't use nothing with the open ssl
license).... can the exception clause be added to the debian package
copyright section of the copyright file?
4) I think that a "libsnmp without openssl" can be very useful for
some packages with a similar problems.... I send two messages about
this to the libsnmp maintainers, but have no further news.... From the
legal point of view, won't have sense to create this kind of packages
(that have a lite versions with legal differences)???

I ask for this questions at debian-mentors but someone recommend to ask here....

Any suggests, tips, related doc ???

Thanks in advance

--
Hasta otra!!!

Eduardo Ferro Aldama
Alea Soluciones


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
[gentoo-user] openssl 0.9.8 installs /usr/lib/openssl.so.0.. - Hi all, I screwed up my openssl installation. Since then, I have to keep links in /usr/lib that will link..

building openssl-devel from openssl src.rpm - hi i tried to do an rpmbuild --rebuild openssl-0.9.6b-35.7.src.rpm on an redhat 7.3 system now i get..

Instead of GPL License - Why not LKL? (Linux Kernel License) - I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is nothing..

[ debian-hurd-Patches-303863 ] FTBFS libnet 1.1.2.1 - Patches item #303863, was opened at 2006-09-26 00:24 You can respond by visiting: ..

[ debian-hurd-Patches-303863 ] FTBFS libnet 1.1.2.1 - Patches item #303863, was opened at 26/09/2006 06:24 You can respond by visiting: ..

[ debian-hurd-Patches-303863 ] FTBFS libnet 1.1.2.1 - Patches item #303863, was opened at 2006-09-26 00:24 You can respond by visiting: ..
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Legal All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]