Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

"Debian" in the social contract

 
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Vote RSS
Next:  "keep non-free" proposal  
Author Message
Raul Miller

External


Since: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 303



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:30 am
Post subject: "Debian" in the social contract
Archived from groups: linux>debian>vote (more info?)

Currently, there seem to be several parts of the social contract which
attract interpretations which conflict with clear intent of the social
contract (as represented by common sense reading of what it has to say,
and as represented by existing practice).

I'm thinking that the use of "Debian" as an noun to refer to products
of the Debian project is overly confusing -- it invites generalities
which don't really make sense.

Here's a list of the usages of the term "Debian" in the social contract:

Debian GNU/Linux Social Contract
1 The Debian Project
1 Debian
1 Debian GNU/Linux Distribution
1 Debian
2 the Debian system
4 Debian systems
4 Debian and comercial software
5 Debian Free Software Guidelines
5 the Debian system
5 Debian
5 Debian

if we also include the DFSG, we also have:

The Debian Free Software Guidelines
1 a Debian component
4 The Debian group
8 Debian
8 a Debian system
8 Debian
8 Debian
8 the Debian system

In my opinion, the best synonym candidate for the word "Debian" in the
cases where it stands alone is "the Debian system".

Also, in my opinion, "Debian GNU/Linux Distribution" is intended to
refer to the same thing as "the Debian system".

Also, in my opinion, I believe our "main" distribution is what we're
referring to when we speak of "the Debian system".

I believe this interpretation makes sense and is self consistent.

I believe Andrew Suffield's proposal to drop part of the social contract
is based on a misunderstanding -- basicaly, a misunderstanding of what
the term "Debian" means in the social contract when it's used by itself.

This, to me, implies that we should modify the social contract so it
no longer uses "Debian" as if it were a noun. Also, I believe that we
should explicitly mention that we have created the "main" area of our
archive for the Debian system.

I hope this is a clear enough statement of what I believe.

If you object to this interpretation, please provide a self-consistent
alternative interpretation based on whatever the point of your
disagreement is.

If you think this makes sense, please let me know.

Thanks,

--
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Proposal -- Debian should be an adjective in the social co.. - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is a proposal to amend the resolution which was first posted in..

social contract proposals - Is anyone reading the list at this point? I've been away from home for most of this last week, and now that I'm back, ...

Bug in Social Contract 1.1?? - Hello! firsth sorry for my english I´m trying to improve it :-) so I will be sort. From ..

[Proposal] Updating the Social Contract - This is based on my current understanding of the issues behind the current discussion about non-free. I propose we..

[Proposal] Social Contract Amendment - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is formally an amendment to the resolution proposed by Andrew Suffield on 29..

[Proposal] Revised Social Contract - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This proposal serves as a replacement for my earlier proposals: ..
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Vote All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]