Welcome to Soft32 Linux Forums!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

2.6.31.4+Benchmarks: Core i5/7 - No turbo boost, maximum s..

 
   Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Kernel RSS
Next:  Accepted ttf-lao 0.0.20060226-3 (source all)  
Author Message
Justin Piszcz

External


Since: Feb 14, 2007
Posts: 206



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:20 pm
Post subject: 2.6.31.4+Benchmarks: Core i5/7 - No turbo boost, maximum speed is always 2.93 GHz?
Archived from groups: linux>kernel (more info?)

Hello,

It looks like turbo boost is never activated...

[ 23.322132] freq-table: target is 0 (2927000 kHz, 0)
[ 23.322133] cpufreq-core: governor: change or update limits
[ 23.322135] cpufreq-core: __cpufreq_governor for CPU 7, event 3
[ 23.322137] cpufreq-core: target for CPU 7: 2927000 kHz, relation 1
[ 23.322138] freq-table: request for target 2927000 kHz (relation: 1) for cpu 7
[ 23.322140] freq-table: target is 0 (2927000 kHz, 0)

I tried setting it manually as well:

cpufreq-set -g ondemand -d 1100000 -u 3600000

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/*max*
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000
2927000

--

Using the latest Intel BIOS on a DP55KG, I have run multiple tests and all
seem to be within the noise:

Q6600:
71.37user 0.56system 1:11.97elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+2002minor)pagefaults 0swaps

i870:
- SpeedStep Tech: ON
- C States: ON
50.14user 0.11system 0:50.27elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2022minor)pagefaults 0swaps
50.14user 0.11system 0:50.27elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2653minor)pagefaults 0swaps

- SpeedStep Tech: OFF
- C States: ON
49.63user 0.13system 0:49.81elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+2021minor)pagefaults 0swaps
49.95user 0.07system 0:50.03elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2022minor)pagefaults 0swaps

- SpeedStep Tech: OFF
- C States: OFF
49.62user 0.11system 0:49.79elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+2021minor)pagefaults 0swaps
50.12user 0.07system 0:50.20elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2022minor)pagefaults 0swaps

- SpeedStep Tech: ON
- C States: ON
- ACPI_FREQ/KERNEL OPTIONS COMPILED IN - Set to: PERFORMANCE

44.50user 0.12system 0:44.69elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+2022minor)pagefaults 0swaps
47.13user 0.09system 0:47.27elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2023minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Still though, something does not seem right, 2.93 GHz -- if the CPU speed
was really increasing to 3.60 GHz this would be much faster?

File: linux-2.6.31.tar
Benchmark: /usr/bin/time bzip2 -c -9 *tar > /dev/null
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo DeleteThis @vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
[PATCH] make sysctl/kernel/core_pattern and fs/exec.c agre.. - Make sysctl/kernel/core_pattern and fs/exec.c agree on maximum core filename size and change it to 128, so that..

Adaptive readahead V16 benchmarks - Andrew, Here are some benchmarks for the latest adaptive readahead patchset. Most benchmarks have 3+ runs and have th...

regarding generic AIO, async syscalls precedent + some ben.. - From two comments posted to my "blog" http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2007/02/04/a-synchronous-programming...

bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zf.. - CONFIG: Software RAID 5 (400GB x 6): Default mkfs parameters for all filesystems. Kernel was 2.6.21 or 2.6.22, did..

Maximum kmem_cache_create size - When using mm/slab.c the maximum size of kmem_cache_created objects seems to be simply KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. Is it the sam...

swap: which is the maximum size allowed? - Hello, I am trying understand the swap. I would like to know which is the maximum swap size on i386. Is 64 MB? If yes,...
       Soft32 Home -> Linux -> Kernel All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Categories:
 Windows
  Linux
 Mac
 PDA


[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]